• deur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Perfectly fine example. You are just dying on the hill of your pretty stupid argument.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Tell me how you change a flip phone into a smart phone with over the air updates, please.

      Also it wasn’t me who made the original argument.

      • Iapar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are missing the point or that is a strawman. The argument ist that it is stupid not to learn from others.

        To use your example: It is stupid to not release a smartphone in the first place.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I was just pointing out that it wasn’t a good comparison because you can’t change the physical limitations of an object over the air, while a software can be updated from being barebone to being full of features overnight. Just look at Steam on release vs today. Sure EGS could/should have included more features on release, but these things can be added and once it included the basic functionalities to allow people to purchase, install and launch games it was a gamble between leaving money on the table by pushing the release back and losing customers that would be angry enough not to come back because of what was to be added at a later date.

          • Iapar@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It makes sense if you interpretate “a brick of a phone” as not many software features. Fewer functions is more brick like.