Title and link taken from reddit. (Don’t kill me I don’t have a Reddit account anymore)

Edit: confirmed

  • Akasazh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    GTA 4 was already a step down. Like with the Matrix not having sequels joke, I will forever regret that rockstar didn’t make any GTA after San Andreas.

    • ikiru@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      GTA 4 was still solid, in my opinion. It’s a way better game than 5.

      I’m looking forward to 6. I’m hoping 5 was a minor blip sandwiched between great games, like GTA 2. I never play online but I hope this game is truly on par with Vice City in quality.

      • Akasazh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can get with that. For me 4 was kind of ok, but I’m terms of humor and gameplay some cracks started showing. The story didn’t grab me and the return to a single city, where Andreas seemed endless was a bit disappointing.

        So for me it marks the beginning of the end, however it’s was not a bad game at all.

        • ikiru@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can see that, too. It is smaller but I liked the return to Liberty City but in a new and improved engine. It was fun and had the kind of classy setting I liked from driving around at night in GTA 3 to classical music.

          GTA 5 really disappointed me because that was the actual spiritual sequel to San Andreas. 5 had one large city but the rest was rural areas and small rundown towns. It made it feel way smaller than San Andreas’ three cities to me. I still prefer San Andreas to 5.

          • Akasazh
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yup Andreas’ map was so very cleverly put together. It felt way bigger than it actually was. 5 is rather big, yet bland in comparison.