• TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    What we need to do is get rid of FPTP, because so long as that’s how the system works breaking away will only guarantee that the fascists win permanently.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think the sad fact is many people in the US are okay with financing genocide as long as they don’t have to hear Trump’s name or suffer any consequences personally. As long as some kind of right wing boogeymany exists, you can convince most democratic voters that genocide is permissable enough to not disqualify a candidate.

        • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think the sad thing is people thinking that if it were Trump instead of Biden right now, there wouldn’t be any genocide. When in fact trump would be supporting genocide both in Gaza and in Ukraine.

          • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            So how much genocide in your opinion is okay to vote for under the suspicion that someone else might also do a genocide?

            Because either you’re admitting theres no way to vote ourselves out of genocide or that joes genocides is okay because someone else MAY also preside over genocide. Thats a new one, this genocide is acceptable because if it wasn’t this, it would just be another genocide, do I have that right?

            Im of the opinion that I cannot materially support genocide. Call it single issue voterism if you want but to me never again means never again, not never again unless maybe the someone else would also finance genocide. Having boundaries is healthy and just, and if genocide is only a soft boundary for someone then I place no value in what they have to say.

              • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                I dont believe voting does much, but I know refusing to vote doesn’t do anything, I don’t see why I wouldn’t show up.

                • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  In FPTP a non-vote is still a vote. I am consistently astonished at Lemmy being unable to understand this simple concept.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            We’d still get genocide regardless of who the president is. The killing machine operates the same no matter who pulls the levers.

            I won’t vote for genocide.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                8 months ago

                No it’s not.

                Their point was that liberals are okay with genocide under Democrats, but if Trump was president they’d be against it. No one thinks that, if Trump were president, there wouldn’t be a genocide. The genocide is non negotiable.

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you prefer

        1. Genocide, drone strikes, mass deportations, legal abortion, Supreme Court judges who aren’t having massive ethics scandals, regulations, etc

        or

        1. Genocide, drone strikes, mass deportation, abortion bans, Supreme Court judges with giant ethics scandals, deregulation, tax cuts for billionaires, etc?

        Both parties are similarly shitty on some things, but are pretty different on other issues. Are you really indifferent to all the issues they differ on?

        • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          When faced with two options that are both genocide why buy into a false dicthomy, also need I remind you abortion became a states right issue (something biden could have prevented) under bidens presidency?

          The stupidest move is to play.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re oversimplifying.

          Under Trump, Democrats would oppose genocide. I guarantee if Trump was president the Democrats would be fighting against him.

          Under Biden, even Bernie is falling in line. It’s disgusting.