• brothershamus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just outrageous that we’re in 202-almost-4 and mail is still in use the way it is.

    Seriously, the fix has been available for almost 30 years, no one has been able - or willing - to popularize it. Hmmm.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not one of them seem to be major and inherent to the technology. Size limits are arbitrary. Privacy concerns can be addressed with the likes of encryption. Email fatigue is a ridiculous reason to gripe about.

          Address spoofing is probably the most annoying but could be addressed my making the actual email the header. So that’s an implementation issue.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Size limits aren’t arbitrary. Email format translates attachments to ASCII which makes them larger and harder to process. Mail servers need to scan and handle messages which means they will need to impose limits to be able to work well. Back in the day when Gmail didn’t it quickly started being abused by people using it as online storage.

            Encryption is difficult to implement with a system that performs multi-point handoff, and works against some use cases like corporate use where you want virus scanning.

            Try to design an alternative email system and you’ll see how quickly you start losing features that make it interesting and useful. For example, for all its faults email is very user-centric and portable, you can easily take your domain and move your addresses to a different provider. How many other communication services can you say that about?