• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Supreme Court is the arbiter of what the constitution means and they set the landscape of the current law of the land.

      Their opinions can change (abortion), but it takes generations to make that change.

      • RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        No it doesn’t. It just takes putting your political toadies in the seats. They just say whatever the fuck they want to say. It’s not an institution that means anything. Not any further than ‘they get to say whatever the fuck they want’ that is. Have you read their decisions? They’re barely even trying to pretend anymore. Why are you?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s the 3rd equal part of government as defined by the US Constitution, so yes, it IS an institution just as much as the Legislative and Executive branches.

          You can’t ignore a constitutionally mandated part of our government just because you don’t agree with them.

          Now, it CAN change. We saw it change on abortion rights, all it takes is a concerted effort to appoint judges who feel the way you do over a 50 year period of time.

          • RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t think you’re being very present in our conversation. You’re not following very well.

            When did I say it wasn’t an institution? When did I say it wasn’t a branch of government?

            all it takes is a concerted effort to appoint judges who feel the way you do over a 50 year period of time.

            Oh there are much easier and faster ways to deal with them. Like for instance just ignoring them.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              When did I say it wasn’t an institution?

              2 Comments above:

              “It’s not some sacred institution that should be respected.”

              1Comment above:
              “It’s not an institution that means anything.”

              When did I say it wasn’t a branch of government?

              That’s implied when you say “just ignore them.”

              You do NOT have the option of ignoring a branch of government defined by the Constitution.

              Anymore than you can choose to ignore the Executive or Legislative branches.

              • RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                sacred, should be respected

                that means anything

                That’s implied when you say “just ignore them.”

                No it isn’t

                You do NOT have the option of ignoring a branch of government defined by the Constitution.

                Yes you do. It’s been done before.

                Anymore than you can choose to ignore the Executive or Legislative branches.

                Yes fuck those branches as well but this is off topic

                • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Wow, so you essentially have absolutely no idea how our system of government works.

                  Good luck with “just ignore it” if you ever end up in court, I guarantee that will not go well for you.

                  • RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    You should crack a history book before you start spouting off about how other people don’t know things. When someone tells you something has been done in the past, it’s kinda dumb to just spout off “that’s not how that works!” with such a smug, sophomoric attitude.