blahsay@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 year agoDouble blind win (by skeletonclaw)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down142
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1imageDouble blind win (by skeletonclaw)lemmy.worldblahsay@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareBedSharkPal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 year agoSingle blind studies do exist though… For some reason.
minus-squarebjorney@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 year agoIf the experimenter never really interacts with the participants and there is no subjective measurement being made there isn’t really any benefit to being double blind, it’s just overhead at that point
minus-squareAnony Moose@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoWell then, how will they gloat and laugh in the participant’s face like in the comic?
minus-squarehansl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoAnd they’re two scientists so it’s really double single blinded win!
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, I think some treatments cannot be done without the scientist knowing.
Single blind studies do exist though… For some reason.
If the experimenter never really interacts with the participants and there is no subjective measurement being made there isn’t really any benefit to being double blind, it’s just overhead at that point
Well then, how will they gloat and laugh in the participant’s face like in the comic?
And they’re two scientists so it’s really double single blinded win!
Yes, I think some treatments cannot be done without the scientist knowing.