• LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And in the current condition of streaming video, it’s a service problem AND a pricing problem. If there was a single service that had nearly every title available, that service could maybe be worth 30-40 ish a month. But instead now if you want access to all titles you have to subscribe to a ton of separate services, never know where to find what you’re looking for, and would have to pay around a hundred bucks a month. So instead i pirate, where the cost is zero dollars a month and everything is always located in the same place.

    • dauerstaender@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine paying to not own something and then being unable to watch because your device is unsupported. Whatever that means for a current web browser…

      • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in favor of being able to pay to access a library containing 99% of titles in existence, even though i don’t “own” permanent access to them. If i had to pay a higher price to “own” each individual title then i would have access to VASTLY less media. But for that monthly payment it must offer access to 99% of titles in existence, and the price must be reasonable for the amount of entertainment value i actually derive from it. Spotify is a perfect example of a 99% complete library at a reasonable price. And yeah as you point out, the service must be available on all devices, like Spotify is.