• black_mouflon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also other than the inherent disgust to bug there is also the fact that since bugs are so small animals they can’t be cleaned and separeted to different parts of the animal. This means that part of what you eat is the intestines of the animal with all the fecal matter in it.

    I simply don’t want shit (or processed shit) in my food. Is that too big of an ask?

        • butterypowered@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh absolutely. That’s why I said “a lot of seafood” and not all seafood.

          As a kid I was grossed out by ‘the black line’ on shrimp/prawns but these days I don’t care.

          I guess wiping baby butts and picking up my dog’s crap has made me a bit more tolerant of these things. :D

          • black_mouflon@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Haha. Well I guess the silver lining is that so long it is not proven to be harmfull healthwise it should be ok. It still grosses me out though. Maybe one day I will be brave enought to accept 2% shit in my food so long it is well cooked.

      • HanlonsButterknife@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most fish, shrimp, lobster are prepared so that you aren’t eating the intestines. The closest seafood-with-intact-intestines I can think of off the top of my head that makes it to the table is crawfish, and de-veining them is a part of the eating process

        • butterypowered@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly I think every time I’ve had shrimp, the vast majority have still had the vein.

          King prawns are a bit different - at least they’re large enough for deveining to be practical.

    • ericjmorey@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The industrial beef slaughterhouses don’t exactly have a pristine track record of keeping shit out of the market either.

      • black_mouflon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still by the nature o these animals being bigger it is practicality easier to separate the different parts. With everithing else being equal. No matter how bad it is, it is going to be less than 100% of the initial shit ammount unlike with the bugs wich I’ll imagine are being crushed whole.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You ever eat a sausage? The casing is made out of intestine. Before it was used as a sausage casing, it was used as a shit container, and it probably still contains traces of shit.

      It also probably contains a few radioactive atoms, a bit of mercury here and there, maybe some arsenic…

      Until and unless food is synthesized from atoms by a Star Trek replicator, it’s going to contain things you don’t want to eat. The best we can do is remove most of those things, but try as we might, we can’t remove them all.