I used to love playing Pandemic, but now that we actually lived through one, none of my friends want to play it anymore, myself included. I’m really looking forward to Daybreak to hopefully reattain the vibes of the original while still being fresh.

Anyone else here getting it or looking forward to it?

  • CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Thanks for your perspective! I totally get it. I imagine at the end of the game you all go “we solved climate change! Hurray!”, and then get back to reality where, “well no we are still living in hell” lol.

    In the end though, I hope that the overall message is “we can do this if we do it together”, and my generation and the next have to be the ones to solve it.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      But the problem is, even if all of the US came together and stopped 100% of our emissions, China would still continue to pump out 90% of the world emissions. So the board game should be a political game about trying to convince China to cap their fuel consumers who are the true contributors to the world’s emissions

      • snota@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        China accounts for 30% of global emissions and, granted the states is half that, but they are still number 2. Also, the per capita number suggest that it would be easier for the individual to make a difference in the states.

        Arguably a lot of China’s emissions come from industry. As America has outsourced a lot of it’s Industry to places like China these emission stats are probably somewhat warped.

        https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country

        • Sandra@idiomdrottning.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          @thorbot@lemmy.world

          And looking at per capita, consumtion based, the US is ten times as bad as China. US: 20 tons per person. China: 2 tons. I think the world average is 4t.

          China still needs to cut down because 2 tons is a lot more than what is OK but holy shit saying

          But the problem is, even if all of the US came together and stopped 100% of our emissions, China would still continue to pump out 90% of the world emissions

          is the wrongest thing I’ve ever heard. There are very few countries on this planet who arr doing worse than the US:

          https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/consumption-co2-per-capita

          @snota@sh.itjust.works @boardgames@feddit.de

          • thorbot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The wrongest thing you’ve heard based on stats that you think are accurate. China always under reports their data and a large majority of fuel consumers in China are smaller private entities that don’t report on it at all. So get all indignant all you want about numbers that aren’t accurate

            • Sandra@idiomdrottning.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              @thorbot

              The wrong thing was that “It doesn’t matter what the US does” when the US is exceptionally culpable on the demand side, the drill side, and the policy side.

      • CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        In terms of the game, each player represents a world power, but there are no specific countries in the game. It’s not played on a world map.