• cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just to make it clear, to anyone who may be in doubt… Ussage does not affect the way your “sandwich” looks.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        True enough, it’ll definitely be distended and have signs of visible arousal during the moments that someone is having vaginal intercourse. No long-term changes after arousal does down, tho.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Correct but only during sex. Returns to normal after use. Not like this picture suggest that the more sex you have the more of an outie you get

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not only that, but every 7 year all your cells in your body are replaced.

          So if you don’t have sex for 7 years, you are back to being a virgin.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ah yes, obviously this is true. I’ve had to circumcise myself every 7 years as a result. Fortunately foreskins are useful for witchcraft, so it’s kind of like a side hustle.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re saying during sex which yes there are physical changes to the presentation that occur when aroused. Not this bullshit sandwich effect for sure but still, they’re not wrong it’s just a really weird point.

          • knightry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The person you’re replying to is named Send me photos. I think they were just trying to get some noods.

            edit: typo

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              I see that, but I responded because the person above sendmephotos was negative and it kinda bothered me.