• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Military aid is generally not cash.

    Now if you want to cut the military budget to do things at home, I’m all for that

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s cash to the weapons manufacturers and substitutes for cash the recipient would need to pay. It’s not like we give those weapons away and then just have fewer weapons.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Student loan debt wouldn’t have been “cash” either. They’re federal loans. They’re just numbers on a computer at this point, and wiping it out would be trivial (as we’ve seen with the continued, successful, attempts for the Biden Admin to continue forgiving these loans on the sly using whatever loopholes they can).

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        What I’m saying is that they say “give $X of aid” but really they’re giving $X worth of munitions and equipment they already have.

        Money on a computer is still money

        • joatmasterofnone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Actually no. It it not always physical goods. Most often it’s a line of credit, basically a way for the government to kick back more funds to contractors that then kick back to bureaucrats and politicians.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Damn, every take you make on this forum is completely asinine lol.

      Military aid is generally not cash.

      So it’s free? Military equipment has no value and giving it away is not a loss?

      • joatmasterofnone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        At least if we are giving them tangible goods rather than cash, it’s not as fungible.

        But I don’t agree with giving ANY country aid. Shut it all off. We have shit at home to deal with.

        Any money being sent abroad is 100% eventually lining the pockets of politicians. Even money spent domestically does.

      • VR20X6@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not, but do you think we’re giving away cutting edge military tech or not developing that cutting edge tech that obsoletes the stuff we’re giving away regardless? It doesn’t really have a lot of value to the US rotting away in warehouse storage.

        Note that I’m not saying this in support of Israel nor am I well enough informed to know if this even applies there. It definitely applies to Ukraine aid, though.

    • joatmasterofnone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The military budget isn’t even that large. You realize that Medicare, Medicaid, and Ss all used to be under HHS. They took it out because then people would realize that’s actually where something like 82% of our budget goes.

      And before you go, “military spending is 40% or whatever” that’s literally because they STOPPED including medicare/medicaid/SS (not all of them but I forget which ones) in those budget numbers. In reality, HHS, MC/MC, and SS EACH are larger line items than military spending.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Bro I’m not engaging with a person who wants to end all foreign aid. That could not possibly be a worse position to hold.