A Challenge: De-‘dash’ and De-‘s’ an Elisp snippet Down below you see an Emacs Lisp code which uses dash, and s libraries. You are tasked with de-‘dash’-ing and de-‘s’-ing this code so that it no l…
Is there an actual reason to de-magnar your libraries? The main reason I use them is they provide some concise approaches to common operations. I get that later emacs have introduced similar functions but I try and maintain support for as wide a range of emacs versions add possible.
I guess it depends on whether you want to have less dependencies and support more Emacs versions, for the opposite.
If I am supplying functions for others, I generally like to keep the dependencies low, just use standard libraries built into Emacs, so I think this could be helpful.
Is there an actual reason to de-magnar your libraries? The main reason I use them is they provide some concise approaches to common operations. I get that later emacs have introduced similar functions but I try and maintain support for as wide a range of emacs versions add possible.
I guess it depends on whether you want to have less dependencies and support more Emacs versions, for the opposite.
If I am supplying functions for others, I generally like to keep the dependencies low, just use standard libraries built into Emacs, so I think this could be helpful.