The Colorado Supreme Court is removing former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot, saying he is ineligible to be president.

In a stunning and unprecedented decision, the Colorado Supreme Court removed former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 ballot, ruling that he isn’t an eligible presidential candidate because of the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban.”

“Even when the siege on the Capitol was fully underway, he continued to support it by repeatedly demanding that Vice President (Mike) Pence refuse to perform his constitutional duty and by calling Senators to persuade them to stop the counting of electoral votes.

“President Trump’s direct and express efforts, over several months, exhorting his supporters to march to the Capitol to prevent what he falsely characterized as an alleged fraud on the people of this country were indisputably overt and voluntary.”

Ratified after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment says officials who take an oath to support the Constitution are banned from future office if they “engaged in insurrection.” But the wording is vague, it doesn’t explicitly mention the presidency, and has only been applied twice since 1919.

We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits,” Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement.

Chief Justice Brian Boatright, one of the three dissenters on the seven-member court, wrote that he believes Colorado election law “was not enacted to decide whether a candidate engaged in insurrection,” and said he would have dismissed the challenge to Trump’s eligibility.

LINKS

AP: Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause | @negativenull@startrek.website

Washington Post: Donald Trump is barred from Colorado’s 2024 primary ballot, the state Supreme Court rules | @silence7@slrpnk.net

CNBC: Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal | @return2ozma

NBC News: Colorado Supreme Court kicks Donald Trump off the state’s 2024 ballot for violating the U.S. Constitution. | 18-24-61-B-17-17-4

CNN: Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from 2024 ballot | A Phlaming Phoenix

CNN:Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from 2024 ballot based on 14th Amendment’s ‘insurrectionist ban’ | @Boddhisatva

New York Times: Trump Is Disqualified From the 2024 Ballot, Colorado Supreme Court Rules | @silence7@slrpnk.net

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah. They could. Honestly though they shouldn’t even be taking the case. The Constitution is pretty clear that the states are in charge of elections.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The Voting Rights Act is ironically what Trump relies on here. It’s possible the court has weakened the law by so much that each state gets to decide.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m not seeing anything in the VRA about candidates. Just about districting and voting. Can you point me to that?

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s not candidates specifically but to what degree the federal government can dictate a state government’s elections. States have full jurisdiction over running elections, and the VRA lets the federal government keep them in check. I guess it’s more the idea of law than the letter, but the idea remains very important in our legal framework.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah, it’s just that the current precedent very much supports the states making decisions about who is and is not eligible to run for office. Technically a Secretary of State could just declare his candidacy to be in violation of the insurrection clause and defend that position in the inevitable court case.

                I did find where SCOTUS already gave itself review power for federal candidates and holds that states cannot add more requirements for federal office. So I was wrong that this wouldn’t go up, even if I disagree with their logic.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I believe it’s an all or nothing type ruling, the 14th either applies or it doesn’t. As the Supreme Court only interprets the constitution/law they cannot change the fact he was found to be part of an insurrection against the United States.