• dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    FreeCAD hates joy.

    I don’t get it. FreeCAD does not have any kind of licensing restriction on commercial use. Is there something I’m missing?

    The models and other files produced with FreeCAD are not subject to any license stated above, nor bound to any kind of restriction or ownership. Your files are truly yours. You can set the owner of the file and specify your own license terms for the files you produce inside FreeCAD, via menu File → Project Information.

    Or do you just not like how the program itself or interface works (which is perfectly valid)?

    • wjrii@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m mostly joking about the interface. FreeCAD is the obvious solution for someone who wants no-restrictions on usable 3D CAD software. It’s one of the most impressive FLOSS projects out there, bar none. It’s awesome.

      It’s also deeply committed to parametric principles, and I think the code to go the “final mile” to make an intuitive interface that doesn’t violate that paradigm is one of the more jealously guarded parts of the commercial packages. I’ve successfully made a few parts in FreeCAD, but it’s always felt like pulling teeth, turning my hobby into work.

      I’m just an oddly tech-leaning English major with fairly simple needs, so the direct modelers and the hybrids where maybe the individual 2D sketches are parametric but the 3D model definitely is not, they still work for me.