Welp, I made a similar thread yesterday regarding Manjaro but I decided to swap to Fedora as my daily driver for stability purposes. Unfortunately since fedora is yet another non Debian distro I need help finding a Syncterm replacement.

I’m my previous thread it was pointed out to me that syncterm has a docker option which I can run on Fedora, but I’d prefer running an app locally if possible.

I tried the Syncterm snap package which boots inside bash, but it doesn’t have ANSI support (which is the entire point of using Syncterm) since I assume it’s simply piggy backing off of bash- hence the 1.5* review on the snap store.

Looking for options… if anyone can help a Linux noob I’m all ears. I tried Alien to convert deb to rpm and fell on my face.

  • Shatur@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Have you considered using Arch on which Manjaro is based?

    This way you won’t have issues with AUR. It’s not hard to install, you can use archinstall helper if you want, it’s available in the default installation media.

    • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If they want a full-fledged system running Arch, then EndeavourOS might be the best bet. Archinstall is great for quickly installing Arch but there’s still quite a lot of set-up required after that, and for some people, they don’t really want to do that. EndeavourOS is essentially a ready-made Arch set up (or as another person said here, a very opinionated Arch install), and is based on Arch’s repos but has its own extra repo for its own software while Manjaro holds the packages back for two weeks (which creates sync problems with, say, the AUR)

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Uses exactly the Arch repos and kernel. EndeavourOS is more like an opinionated Arch install than a stand-alone distro. This is not a negative comment as I am an enthusiastic EndeavourOS user.

        • CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          EndeavourOS is more like an opinionated Arch install

          Fellow EOS user and this is a hilarious yet accurate description. Still have vanilla arch but EOS on my laptop now since I tend to mess with it often.

      • lseif@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        i too am a satisfied endevouros user. its great if you want something like manjaro, that doesnt break, or something like arch, but easier to get started.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can do this, and I have, but there can be issues during the switch if you are not careful.

        The machine I use as my Jellyfin server used to be Manjaro and is now vanilla Arch ( having migrated it from Manjaro to Arch in place ). It still has a few quirks though. The quirks do not matter for what I use it for ( it is rock solid for Jellyfin ) but anytime I have to reboot or use the desktop, I am reminded. Nothing too serious and nothing I could not fix with a little time of course. That machine is purely functional though and I do not want to spend any time on it. Since my video is all on a second drive, I will probably nuke it and do a fresh EndeavourOS install one of these days. It would be much faster to re-install Jellyfin than to fix all the little warts. The other Manjaro systems I had were replaced with fresh EndeavourOS installs.