Microsoft and Activision have indicated that they may abandon their proposed $68.7 billion merger if federal courts grant FTC a preliminary injunction.

    • gk99@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not when there’s competition that drives improvement across the comparable choices. Personally, I see this deal as a good thing long-term because it would force Sony to continue actually competing after having been complacent the entire PS4 generation. Most of the potential downsides stem from Microsoft owning Call of Duty and being able to bend it to their whim, but people here should know better than anyone that having alternatives to a massive, increasingly shitty product is a good thing, and Sony will be busting their ass to get one up, running, and popular prior to that 10 year deadline.

        • rcoelho14@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly, I don’t see how Microsoft taking Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Starfield, and other games away from Sony and Nintendo increases competition.

          It just forces people to buy into their ecosystem (Xbox or Windows) if they want to play the games they could play in their prefered platform before

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To really have a real choice you need to have interoperable choices at several levels. Choosing between two jails is not really a choice.