• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    221
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok a 50 page memo? That’s pretty friggin long. Depends how many of those you get a day.

    But:

    I summed up this highly classified memo into Trump’s sort of bombastic language because it was the only way he was gonna understand," Taylor added. “I mean, I literally said in there, ‘You know, if we leave Afghanistan too fast, the terrorists will call us losers. But if we wanna be seen as winners, we need to make sure the Afghan forces have the strength to push back against these criminals.’ I mean, it was that dumb and that’s how you had to talk to him.”

      • CassowaryTom@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        140
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No. The President of the United States of America needs to be able to internalize and contextualize the details of the current geopolitical climate over corn flakes. This “only human” bullshit has got to go.

        • Oliver Lowe@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely agree with you. The point I wanted to make is that there are different ways to summarise, say, in this example, a 50-page memo. The sad thing here is how the official needed to resort to the good versus evil false dichotomy. This oversimplification to have been required because, unfortunately, Trump is stupid.

          I guess I’m saying that it’s a shame that there are probably a lot of smart people trying to make sense of all the geopolitics, picking things apart, critical thinking… but in the end it was all for nought; they had to appeal to someone - Trump - who never really wanted to, nor was able to, internalise or contextualise it.

                • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  34
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There’s nothing nonsensical about their comment. Long winded? Absolutely. Do you not agree with it? Probably, but just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it nonsensical.

                  But even if it did make no sense, there’s no excuse for personal attacks. That’s just being shitty.

                  Don’t shit this place up like Reddit. It’s not welcome here.

            • Oliver Lowe@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              Haha yes I think you’re right! I find it difficult. And I’m interested in getting better at it. That’s part of the reason why I like discussing stuff on Lemmy. Do you have any tips?

              I think my original comment was taken as if I was excusing Trump. That sucks. I wanted to convey the opposite :(

                • Oliver Lowe@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Thanks :) I think I’ll follow that advice, especially on political forums! My clumsy wording aiming to criticise Trump was taken the wrong way and generated negativity. Thanks for your time.

        • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I’m a normal human and I have no trouble reading at a highschool level why can’t the president do it?

          • CassowaryTom@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, I know that you are making fun of me, and I would like to point out that I’m speaking about the former president, but yes.

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          A 50 Page memo is too long. It is relevant for the discussion of the details between the specialised people, so they reach a highly qualified opinion, but the cause and effects of different decision options need to be summarised on a few pages. Of course the president needs to be able to understand what the bullet points entail, but it is literally impossible for a president of a country the size of the US to read up on the details of every decision.

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              What is the point of a 50 Page Memo that you just skim through, easily overlooking stuff, instead of having a 5 page comprehensive summary?

              Any good leader needs to delegate things. If he cant trust people with making summarys and understand these, instead relying on his quick-read-hopefully-not-overlook-something skills, then that is terrible for the country.

              Also again, giving your boss something to read expecting he only reads a quarter of, is both a failure of your boss and you, as you are wasting each others time this way.

              Ibdon’t doubt that stuff had tobbe dumped down forbTrump, but amount of pages is not a good metric and the more pages a memo has, the more it gets questionable if it is an appropriate mean of communication

              • gencha@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If they give memos like that to any other president, I would assume it has merit.

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I suspect most world leaders would have people who have the necessary expertise to condense that down and just give them the high level overview. Dense and technical. Sit down with those advisors and talk through the pros and cons. Probably pull out the original 50 page document in places to “zoom in” on details.

              But following the Trump administration, he got rid of anyone around him who wasn’t a sycophant, so that limits his choice of staff somewhat, leaving the guy who’d normally submit a 50 page memo and assume the president read it all (along with dozens of other similar size memos from other departments), to break it down himself, like feeding a toddler by pretending the spoon is an aeroplane.

            • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If the memo was made 100% for the President’s eye, then he should read it in detail. If not, there should be a summary containing only the important bits, because Presidents shouldn’t be skimming through long memos and potentially missing stuff.

              Not giving Trump a pass here btw, man’s as stupid as he is evil.

          • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean, other Presidents and high level defense officials seem to be handling it just fine. I’d also bet that there are pictures, charts, and supporting information in that 50 pages, and that the actual meat of the document is going to be smaller. I’ve read plenty of 50 page documents like that. It doesn’t take that long and Trump definitely had the time. He spent many mornings live tweeting Fox News

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              i’m sure that Trump had things dumbed down for him. But what is the point of giving someone 50 pages to just read a few off? And “taking that long” is relative. For these kind of reports or so at work, reading them properly takes at least 2 hours. So if the president gets 5 if these on his desk he calls it a day and gets back to governing the next day, when he is finished reading?

              Crossreading is also terrible, as it easily overlooks maybe critical information. Have someone write a comprehensive summary and give the president time to actually think about which decision is best.

              • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                We’re getting off on a little bit of a tangent about proper memo reading but usually the point of supporting information is that you don’t know if the reader is going to need it. You don’t have a full picture of what the president knows already and you have no way of knowing how the president’s thought process is going to go. They might need more information about something that happened or a decision being made to help inform their decisions or they might not, because it’s not really relevant to the direction they want to go. Sure, 50% of it might go unread but you never know what info will fall into that 50%, exclude it and the document is incomplete.

                Ultimately, though, the point remains that the memo sizes haven’t really been a problem for others. Typically you don’t make it that high up without being an extremely effective reader. It’s just that this time we wound up with someone unfit and in way over his head.

              • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m sure the professionals across the different departments of the government that report directly to the most important person in the country have no idea how to write effective memos. You should go over to DC and educate them with your wisdom.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is a succinct summary and then there is saying things like “If we don’t do this, the bad guys win,” which is the level of dumbing down that had to be done.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    deep state n. 1. People in government who don’t stop doing their jobs just because there was an election; e.g. police and prosecutors who continue to pursue murderers without asking the new mayor whether to let that one go. 2. (Federal) People in government capable of reading at an 8th-grade level or higher.

  • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nothing new here. We heard things like this a few months into his presidency.

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    incandescent ĭn″kən-dĕs′ənt adjective Emitting visible light as a result of being heated. Shining brilliantly; very bright. synonym: bright. Characterized by ardent emotion, intensity, or brilliance.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, if you leave out the word ‘stupid’ from the phrase where those two words were obviously meant to go together, you would have a point.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t have a point. I thought it was an odd choice of words, so I looked up the definition and posted it. And then wake up to downvotes for something I meant to be benign. Not everything has an agenda.

  • JamesKE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    98
    ·
    1 year ago

    And you expect Biden to have a sound mind to understand these memos, let alone to actually remember them for more than a day? Compared to the elderly and dementia patient Biden, Trump is a theoretical physics professor.

    • BadRS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. We aren’t debating this. There aren’t two sides here. No one is buying your what about bullshit.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, Trump is VERY good with the nuclear! He could have discovered the atomic bomb if he was born a little earlier!

      Anyway, if you listen to Biden speak for more than 10 second clips on Fox or some pathetic internet underbelly, it’s extremely obvious that is not accurate. He can answer questions and sound normal for 30-60 minutes, but if he stumbles over a word internet pundits, Fox, newsmax etc will jerk off about it for months. Meanwhile a speech by Trump is basically him talking about how great he is, interrupting himself, sneering and insulting various people for 45 minutes.

    • Fluba@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      My grandpa passed away from Alzheimer’s. He needed help swallowing and he had to have a cup strapped to his hand when drinking (through a straw) because his muscles forgot how to grip. Biden is fine.

    • lemmetskiy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s always hilarious seeing common people desperately sucking corporate or politician cock. Who named Biden dude?

    • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d rather have neither, but at least Biden isn’t a card-carrying villain; just a very old, decrepit man who’s way too old for the job (which Trump is too btw).

    • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cool, so Trump is now the same age Biden was when he gearing up for this presidency. People with your (incorrect) view were saying Biden was too old then. So that means Trump’s too old now, right? I’d also love to know why a life long stutter equates to dementia. If that’s true, then people I know have had dementia since they learned to talk.