Source.

On Nathan J. Robinson. I learnt yesterday that he didn’t do any union-busting, and the departing writers/editors who stirred up so much drama on left-Twitter were lying all along. This article by Yasmin Nair gives the full breakdown with a lot of receipts.

I was linked this article by @HarryLime@hexbear.net in his post yesterday, where NJR was vindicated on calling out Fetterman being terrible back in 2022. The replies to that tweet are filled with people dunking on Nathan, while the quote tweets, almost all from the past couple days, are filled with everyone apologizing.

It’s pretty interesting to see.

I’m currently going through his other tweets. So far, NJR seems like a pretty decent guy with a lot of good analysis’, completely different from the caricature I made up in my mind from memes and tweets.

It’s quite strange. I used to read Current Affairs before the “incident” and even listened to the podcast. I liked everyone there, including Nathan. I guess that’s why when I heard what happened, and saw in real time all the people I liked fighting with each other (well, all the people I recognised from the articles and the podcast dunking Nathan), I felt betrayed in a sense. I remember writing an email or filling out a form or something similar that the writers who’d been “fired” had set up. Maybe I donated money too, but I don’t remember that. If I did, it would be a small amount.

And I stopped my subscription to Current Affairs, changing it to Jacobin instead.

There was a lot of trolling that went on. I don’t think I ever tweeted at him personally, but that doesn’t matter. I know I consumed the tweets and posts (even here and on the subreddit back when it existed!)

Why? For me, I guess, it was a sense of justice mixed with betrayal: here was a man who headed an org I respected who had betrayed these principals we all hold dear, and in doing so hurt these other people who I also like. And the only power I have in enacting “justice” is in ridiculing him a little bit.

But even then, that never achieved anything. I won’t say “dunking” as a whole is useless. It can be useful in bringing people together and giving us a sense of camaraderie, but only when it’s against deserving subjects - billionaires and the like. It’s like part of forming an identity around common things we hate.

But… completely divorced from any other forms of unification, any other ways to group and coalesce, all that left is a weak identity that does nothing but dunk for no other purpose. Thats, I guess, what happened to me.

None of us here became leftists for the purpose of trolling others. Using it to hurt and bully others is what people on the right do, even if they consider themselves apolitical sometimes.

But dunking on Nathan…became that. Didn’t it? In the article, Yasmin Nair points to real world examples of people bullying him. I imagine they did so out of a similar feeling of “betrayal”, and sought “justice” too. But how would that achieve it? It wouldn’t. It can’t.

This happened because we separated our actual politics - leftism - from our online activities. Maybe not all of us, but I’d wage at least quite a few. If Current Affairs had failed in the years between the Incident and the start of Jan, 2024, I would’ve thought “sad this happened, but serves him right” with no thought to the actual damage that would’ve done to the real world impacts of losing a magazine like that to left politics.

That’s a failing on my part. It’s a failing that I let my personal grievances with Nathan (Ill-informed as I now know) shut me off completely from Current Affairs as a whole, with all the great writers who work and publish there, then and now.

I remember there was an effort, early on in this site’s history, of making this place more than just a place to shitpost online - to actually be used to organise. It failed, partly because we were small and partly because we were too resistant. There were also onboarding efforts to allow us to grow to mitigate that first problem, but it ran into the second one, our resistance to change, and, well, here we are today. Is there anyone here who remembers those days? What a mess. Since then, a lot of original people who created and did the heavy lifting of maintaining this site, including creatively, left.

I remember enquiring sometime ago, maybe 2022, maybe 2023, about what happened to the writers who left Current Affairs. Have they found other jobs? Where are they working, publishing, podcasting? I wanted to support them. I didn’t figure it out. Some have now deleted their Twitter, others have privated their accounts. Maybe it’s for the best.

Maybe things could’ve been different if we could’ve grown and changed and been the place for atleast left-adjacent people to come by the time Reddit exploded and people started to migrate to Lemmy. Who knows? That’s a different world, and probably also a different post. But at least we could learn something from our mistakes. I am trying to from mine. —

This went in directions I wasn’t expecting. I just typed out my thoughts as they came to me. You don’t really have to read it.

TLDR: “I’m sorry, Nathan” and maybe dunking, without any thing else, is not good.

  • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Talking a big game on twitter about wanting to put Jeff Bezos in a cage and wearing a cravat are both individual aesthetic decisions with no material impact. So I’m not sure why the former is ‘based’ and the second is ‘cringe’. Maybe latent homophobia? Beats me.

    • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The reason you think people need your advice about dropping the adventurism for the cravat is because those are the only two elements of your environment. The world may never recover from the creation of social democracy

          • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Ever notice how many users of this site are totally fine with chauvinist social democrats who attack the USSR, attack China, attack DPRK and want free healthcare? These users don’t outright claim these positions (they know they’ll get jumped on) they instead just come out of the woodwork once a fortnight to defend people who hold them and play word games and use emotional/aesthetic appeals instead of outright defending the succ dem worldview. They did this for “the squad”. They did this for Bernie. They do this for NJR. They do this for “the Iron Front” anti-communists, 3-arrow types. They do it for “Rojava” American airbase. They do it for Chomsky. They literally cannot stop themselves from defending social imperialists while claiming they aren’t social imperialists themselves, but that we are just “creepy” for disagreeing.

            Ew violent revolution? What are you, Creepies? You want revenge on the rich? You are a serial killer!

              • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                This is generally the point at which I pivot into screaming about the development of the 2africa cable, how western telecoms are likely sabotaging other african cables, & how the periphery getting better internet will change everything, but Zuck will control how if we let him. How we need to get Hexbear into Somali twitter (just kidding)

                • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Look you can’t have your cake and eat it too by getting pissy that no one will own up to being critical of the ussr or China and by getting pissy when someone does point out that they’ve been critical of both on here.

              • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I mean this shit is widespread, nobody’s saying this originated with the site or you. Aren’t you also talking about the left at large when it suits you? Mix it up, go to lots of apps with western online socdems and lets the sameyness sink in. The horror! The whole fixation on “ideology salad” is stapled over milquetoast status quo-reinforcing ideas but not-so-secretly they believe it makes them the most radical, the Goldilocks solution, not too radical, not too online, not too reactionary, not too based.

                Left unity spaces are generally meant to reinforce this dynamic. Although if I could make any website it would be a decoy soviet site that gently guides people into Samir Amin thought & a true comprehension of their tragic downfall rather than blind nostalgia. I can see how it could be done right. (BY ME flowey-smug )

            • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              When I realize how bad it is, I go back to viewing whatever segment of the internet as a series of text input fields that produce names of books I can pirate. 😶‍🌫️ I guess I’ve gone back and forth with western online socdems.

      • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The reason you think people need your advice about dropping the adventurism for the cravat

        What adventurism? We haven’t got any adventurism. The closest we’ve got to adventurism is a adventurism facade on shitposting.

    • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Like I mean that ecologically. The creation of neoclassical economics combined with social democracy has completely obliterated class consciousness to the point people are being scolded for supporting “indiscriminate pirate attacks” because they could be raising big mac prices

      • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The problem with aristocrats isn’t that they drop their r’s or wear cravats, so who cares if NJR wants to dress as a caricature of one? He’s not making us look any more ridiculous than the people posting arcane drilbits on twitter in the Chris Hayes mentions.

        • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well maybe I missed that being the crux of this thread, because it sure looks a whole lot like people directly quoting him and the claims against him. There was passing mention of the outfits. I have been defending NJR’s takes for actually BEING BETTER THAN SOME OF THE “PRO-PALESTINE PEOPLE” WHO RUN WITH THE “HOUTHI PIRATES” NARRATIVE BUT ADD “IT’S GOOD ACTUALLY” I don’t care about the cravat. He also sucks and is a socdem and the twitter people who like him severely overestimate how funny they are.

          I care about you thinking people wanting to kill their boss is creepy. It’s a sign you have several senses and breathe oxygen, in most cases, like food service. Especially if you have a slappable ass like I do!

          • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            care about you thinking people wanting to kill their boss is creepy.

            That is creepy. Hating your boss isn’t creepy. Working for a system where they aren’t in a position to make your life miserable constantly isn’t creepy. But if immediately jumping to “this sucks, wish I could kill him” and harboring consistent, violent thoughts directed at another person isn’t creepy, what exactly is creepy supposed to mean?

            • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              That is creepy.

              I’ve got bad news for you about the revolution.

              You are just repeating conservative/Nietzchean critiques of socialism as “Ressentiment” that have been used against socialists for hundreds of years.

              Guess what, actual real revolutionaries that seize power around the world are children of desperation who ARE fulfilling their revenge fantasy and that’s GOOD. Infinite revenge on the western world. The Yemenis and North Koreans are constantly fantasizing about killing American troops, and that’s what makes them the best people on Earth. Your lack of anger is an indictment of you, the underclasses of the world have legitimate anger and will only prevail when they embrace it fully as a class.

              I fall asleep every night thinking warm thoughts how to best fuck up and sabotage this imperialist monster. That’s the energy we need in everyone.

              You are obsessed with bourgeois optics, you’ve internalized them when you think violent revolution is “creepy”

            • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              What is creepy is turning the chair around and engaging in this concern trolling because you saw people make adventurist comments. Talking like “my fellow leftists, we have a problem with guillotine jokes. stop making fun of people who wear bow ties” and then explaining you mean tucker carlson when someone is like “what”

              If you’ve never heard anyone talk like that and think it’s a sign of being a serial killer who harbors actual plans of killing their boss, I can reassure you it is quite common.

              Joking about pushing the boss into the trash compactor is in fact funny even if it misses the forest for the trees. (Forest being upper management & finance, etcetera.)

              • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Joking about pushing the boss into the trash compactor

                You do know the humor in the joke only works when everyone is on the same page about no one actually wanting to push them into the trash compactor? Obviously occasionally joking about killing your boss isn’t creepy. Actually wanting to kill your boss is creepy.

                If I joke about wanting to jump in traffic to get out of a meeting, it’s funny because everyone knows I don’t actually want to jump in traffic. If I tell my coworker about wanting to go jump in traffic and they think I mean it, it’s somewhat less funny.

                  • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Look, you and I both know the person saying “liberals get the bullet too” on twitter is actually as harmless as Dr. Cravat P. Fancylad, but not everyone does. And I don’t appreciate having to repeatedly explain to my brainwormed parents that actually communism doesn’t involve lining them up against a wall and shooting them.

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              But if immediately jumping to “this sucks, wish I could kill him” and harboring consistent, violent thoughts directed at another person isn’t creepy, what exactly is creepy supposed to mean?

              Very glad we still have folks here who understand how ordinary people would react to some of the stuff we post.

              For some reason I’m reminded of us pointing and laughing at Israel for being so up their own asses they don’t realize how they’re creeping out everyone who doesn’t already agree with them.

              • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Very glad we still have folks here who understand how ordinary people would react to some of the stuff we post.

                I mean, on here I don’t really care; it’s for internal consumption. In my massive struggle session about how Killing Alexei Romanov was not justified, I got off some zingers about the execution. It’s fine, we’re all mostly on the same page here.

                The point I’m getting at in this thread is there are plenty of people who wont’ hesitate to make fun of NJR for “making leftists look ridiculous” while posting “Daddy Xi pls nuke us all” from a twitter account with a mao-aggro-shining profile picture.

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  it’s for internal consumption

                  I agree with basically everything, but I don’t know why we all think a public forum is our exclusive hidden clubhouse, or if it was, why that would matter if someone wanted to write/post somewhere else about “look at how crazy the left is.”