• aeternum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t put it past them to make it illegal to travel to another US state to get an abortion.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s in violation of the commerce clause of the constitution

      That’s why you can buy weed in Colorado and not be prosecuted in Texas, as an example.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        So basically someone would have to appeal it to the SC if the feds came after them.

        Considering the state of the court, I wouldn’t count on the commerce clause standing in regards to prosecuting abortions.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is a violation until it goes to scotus who will say that it doesn’t apply just like with the precedent of Roe v Wade and that made up case about a website for a gay couple.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I definitely understand the sentiment, but this is literally written into the constitution - the others are reinterpretations of former decisions

          They’re both bullshit, and one didn’t even have standing, but they’re much easier to “justify”