• ElCrusher@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, the person should be charged with a crime for what he did, but the dog was just following its training as a police dog. They’re supposed to do what the handler tells them to do. It’s not the dogs fault; it did exactly what it was supposed to do had the situation called for the dog to attack.

      • hypelightfly@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The dog attacked an unarmed person

        Yes.

        randomly

        No, it was far from random. The dog was ordered to attack an unarmed person.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Then I suppose the trainer is an accomplice in the crime.

      What would you do with the dog then? Send it to a farm? It’s trained to attack humans. We don’t let a dog like that live in the city.

      • Ryctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Police dogs retire all the time. Assuming this highly trained animal goes to a cartaker who doesn’t know or issue the commands, that dog is harmless as any other, arguably more so

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It sounds like you just have a problem with concept of police dogs in general. That’s fine, but it’s a separate discussion.