IBM scraps rewards program for staff inventions, wipes away cash points | Big Blue staffers aren’t pleased to lose out on potential bonuses::Big Blue staffers aren’t pleased to lose out on potential bonuses

  • witty_username
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What do you mean by that? Aren’t IBM the gleaming gold standard of ruining your market dominance with idiotic management practices and investor-driven shortsightedness?
    If anything, I am surprised they still had schemes that incentivise employees by distributing some form of equity

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      IBM is what a company that survived crossing to the other side of the enshittification fence looks like. They are profitable, for sure, but they have nothing of value to offer to an actual human being. They only speak corpo and their only semi-amiable relationships are with other corporate entities via contracts, negotiations, arbitration, and lawsuits. It’s functionally and physically incapable of communicating, offering a product or relating with an average real person, for they haven’t known what that is in at least three decades.

      • aname@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        IBM has always been a business-to-business. Their name literally comes from International Business Machines.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I suppose the several IBM PCs I owned in the 80s and 90s were all just hallucinations. Useful hallucinations though, they taught me to use DOS and to program in BASIC.

          • aname@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think I claimed they don’t do consumer stuff but business stuff has always been their core business.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            IBM wasn’t interested in PCs, and they were already enshittifyjng by then.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          They began that way, then they branched into personal computation when that became a thing. Then they took a machine gun to their feet in that market

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s was too much hassle for too little profit. Their bread and butter is having regular people not remember they still exist.

        • XEAL@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          A company is not necessarily limited to the activities implied by its name.

          • aname@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Did I say that? OP complained that IBM has become so business oriented recently, but that has always been its core business.

            • XEAL@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s what it sounded like and I’m not the only guy who saw it that way ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

              • aname@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                That just means more than one people jump to conclusions

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Exactly this. The effort of selling one z Series is not one million times higher than selling a laptop, but the profit is.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Aren’t IBM the gleaming gold standard of ruining your market dominance with idiotic management practices and investor-driven shortsightedness?

      Honestly, when I think “IBM”, I can’t help but think of the company that built the industrial accounting machines for the Nazis back in the 1930s.

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I expected more from a renowned company, rookie mistake I guess.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They went shitty decades ago.

        I’d say at best the PC wars is a good demarcation, maybe even before then.