I’ll stick with Japanese cars that don’t fall apart in the first pot hole
The Rover is far worse. You can’t even see over the grill to know if a child is in front of the vehicle.
The Ferrari, so I can sell it and get a better car than the Range Rover.
They’re both terrible in terms of reliability and I wouldn’t want to daily either one, but the Ferrari will retain value.
Big time, in fact it should gain value.
All I’m going to do with a Ferrari is worry about it getting damaged or stolen. Also a Ferrari is more likely to get pulled over and the cost for insurance will be outrageous.
I’ll take the Range Rover.
Also it says pick ONE, and the Ferrari is notoriously impractical. While the Range Rover is super practical in almost every way.
But in reality both are bad choices, because the Rover as NEMO also writes, has a high front, that can cause dangerous situations, and it’s uneconomical.
I’d rather have something like the VW ID7: https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/id7-15406I couldn’t afford either of them, so it’s really a moot point
Wait, I thought @balderdash9@lemmy.zip was offering to buy one for The Winner?!?
I mean the Range is probably more practical for me with the family, plus I’m less likely to crash it.
At the same time… turning up for work in that Ferrari would certainly get people talking; until someone keys it.
I’m sure !fuckcars@lemmy.ml would love both.
!bicycles@lemmy.ca would like to casually converse, as well.
deleted by creator
Enjoy the F-40 for a while then sell it and get a cool but practical car and save the rest of the money.
RR for me. Where I live, the Ferrari would gett stuck on the first speedbump. Plus, the RR is more practical as I am a family man.
If it was a lottery prize or something, I’d pick the Ferrari with the intent of selling it right away - I am buying a Volvo XC90 in March, and then I wouldn’t have to worry about a car loan.
