• Quatity_Control@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can it tie a shoelace? No. If you gave it manipulators and a shoe, would it tie the laces? No. Can it do a Rorschach test? No. Can it create a new idea? No.

    It can barely pretend to talk reasonably about these things because it is only designed to talk reasonably about anything. That is not intelligence.

    • Barbarian772@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I said it is as intelligent as the average human. How many humans can really create 100% new knowledge? Why would it be unable to tie laces? I am pretty sure I have seen videos of animals doing it. Of course it can’t do a rohrschach test, as it doesn’t have any visual capabilities atm. If that’s a measure for intelligence blind people wouldn’t qualify either.

      • Quatity_Control@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        New knowledge is simply creativity which AI distinctly do not have. The shoelace and Rorschach are variations of the same point. ChatGPT regurgitates info from the internet and uses confirmation bias to present it conversationally. ChatGPT cannot understand the concept that a shoe has a lace that should be tied. It can only answer a question about that by using prepublished information related to tying shoelaces. As for Rorschach, even with a visual component, ChatGPT is by its nature incapable of interpreting the data itself. It is quite simply not what the engine does.

        Understand what ChatGPT does, do not project your idea of what an AI can do onto its single occasionally accurate trick.