L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe World’s Largest Wind Turbine Has Been Switched Onwww.iflscience.comexternal-linkmessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1338arrow-down17file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansworldnews@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.orgtechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1331arrow-down1external-linkThe World’s Largest Wind Turbine Has Been Switched Onwww.iflscience.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square66fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansworldnews@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.orgtechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarebackslashhh@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down4·1 year ago just one of these turbines should be able to produce enough electricity to power 36,000 households of three people each for one year. per year? per lifetime? per second?
minus-squarebingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoOne year per year. And no, they obviously don’t understand basic math.
minus-squarekemsat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI took it to mean that in 1 year it will produce the equivalent amount that 36k 3-person homes would use during that same year.
minus-squareMeowoem@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIn an average year it will generate what 36k homes use on average in a year.
per year? per lifetime? per second?
One year per year. And no, they obviously don’t understand basic math.
I took it to mean that in 1 year it will produce the equivalent amount that 36k 3-person homes would use during that same year.
In an average year it will generate what 36k homes use on average in a year.