• 0 Posts
  • 38 Comments
Joined 4 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2024

help-circle



  • The president can’t kill anyone who opposes him. The president is subject to the laws just like anyone else. Breaking the law is not part of his official duty. Assassinating someone the president doesn’t like is against the law.

    Assassinating an enemy of the United States is a different story. The president cannot claim a citizen of the United States with no criminal activity or record against the United States is an enemy. Furthermore, the military cannot use force on citizens of the United States. The FBI can, and the president doesn’t control the FBI the judicial branch does.

    Aren’t checks and balances fun?!


  • The best example is first responders. They have immunity doing their duty. They cannot hesitate to perform their duty - such as giving life saving services - if they fear they are unsuccessful and are sued / thrown in prison. If they break the law though on duty it was never their duty to break the law and are therefore not immune. Take CPR. They might perform CPR and injure the person they are working over, or they might not save them. The family of that person cannot sue them, nor can a court convict them if they accidentally make things worse.

    Same thing with the president. The president can’t break the law and say, “whoops, just doing my official duty”. It doesn’t work like that.












  • First responders have (in some counties had) immunity while doing their job. If grandma needs CPR you don’t want a first responder to hesitate to provide that CPR because they might crack a rib and get sued, or worse, thrown in jail.

    The president should not be afraid to make decisions in fear of political retaliation, which is exactly what this ruling clarifys.

    If the first responder breaks the law they are held accountable. If the president breaks the law they will be held accountable.

    This doesn’t mean the president can do whatever they want and they are immune from the law. That’s ridiculous. The ruling even states that.