Rules for the “compost waste” doesn’t apply for making the compost that you use as a fertilizer. Maybe that’s why we call it “wet”. It’s basically anything that is biodegradable. But not everything that is biodegradable is ok for fertilizing…
Rules for the “compost waste” doesn’t apply for making the compost that you use as a fertilizer. Maybe that’s why we call it “wet”. It’s basically anything that is biodegradable. But not everything that is biodegradable is ok for fertilizing…
Nice, this may be the path to kill AI made for money and not for helping people
Great! Anyway, still far from what you can get with tmux or kitty with just a line in the config…
The thing is that the qdbus command only works from inside the terminal, because it needs to know the correct konsole instance. Anyway, I moved to alacritty because the konsole support for ANSI codes is terrible…
Qdbus command:
qdbus $KONSOLE_DBUS_SERVICE $KONSOLE_DBUS_SESSION runCommand "!!"
I never tried PopOS, but I would never suggest Ubuntu. Manjaro is easy, updated, there are many people using it, offers large number of software, works well with Nvidia and other propietary drivers (the thing that generates issues for new users, usually). I know people think they had “security” problems, but they always explained what happened, and they just had a bad contract with the CDN service and a misleading error message in pamac, that didn’t impact the security of the user.
Remember, it’s Microsoft… it can’t be normal
Sad story
I also use Ventoy. Someone says it has problems, I never found them
The thing is that people use Linux and than find it so good that they try to find problems in order to spend time playing with it. It’s like a hobby, or a game… But you can also use it without making it a hobby. Ubuntu was born for this, but for that I would honestly suggest something like Manjaro
I guess there are many benefits if subprocesses (usually written in C) are replaced with functions (usually wrapping C code). That way, you could run an entire OS scripts via Python, with sensible performance improvements.
BUT
Does this tool replace shell commands with python functions? Or does it just call many times subprocesses.run()
?
LoL, interesting. I don’t know how it was generated, it seems they used frozen scores, so maybe time has it influence there
It’s not random people, it’s people interested in cinema. Filmaffinity has a similar approach, but being more used in Latin countries, it doesn’t have that US-taste pervading any review. For instance, “Perfect Days” is scored slightly higher than “Hoppeneimer” and much higher than “The Zone Of Interest”, and I really agree with that.
I prefer filmaffinity… I’m 90% in line with those ratings
I Always found the rating on IMDB totally misleading. I guess they work for the US public, but many good movies have low rating…
You’re so funny man
KaOS is based on Debian?
How often do you use images inside a terminal?
Why having a Gpu-accelarated terminal? The computational power used by the graphical rendering of a terminal is minimal…
How often do you use the image display within a terminal?
Kitty is not “minimal” at all, it’s full of superfluous features… I used it for many years and I loved it, but I wouldn’t say it’s “minimal”
What are the benefits if Gpu-accelarated terminals? From my understanding, that’s a really negligible difference.
Probably the second is the reason