Krause [he/him]

  • 38 Posts
  • 448 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle















  • Hey dipshit, did you read the link you posted? That’s the number I’m referencing. It claims that 1.107.480 out of 900.000 troops have been wounded, can you figure out how we know this is obvious bullshit? Hint: one of the numbers is a bit higher than the other.

    Unfortunately, for Russians, there are a lot of men in Russia and the Russian leaders like to use meat grinder tactics.

    But according to your link they’ve already run out of men. Also, the Russian ground forces are only about ~550.000 troops, you expect me to believe that an additional ~557.480 from the navy and air force were also injured? In a land war? IN A NAVY OF ~160.000 AND AN AIR FORCE OF ~165.000? THESE NUMBERS ARE LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE!


  • If field artillery was as useful as you claim, then Russia wouldn’t be doing so poorly.

    Russia is only doing poorly in your cope fantasies, Russia won the war.

    The vast majority of casualties in this war (just like in WW1) have been due to artillery.

    There is a reason that we don’t use carpet bombing anymore

    But you literally do.

    moved to precision guided munitions

    This never happened, it’s just propaganda to pretend that America’s wars are “more humane”.



  • If it cost 200 times more for a single missile but you need to fire 200 artillery shells to accomplish the same result. Well, what’s cheaper?

    Shells are way easier to produce than guided missiles, this comparison is asinine. Why are you comparing just the “price” of the two options? Have you also considered that artillery is not just for destroying things but also to deny control of an area or send support fire to a position? Good luck doing that with one fucking missile, I’ll take the 200 shells.

    Liberals shouldn’t speak about things they don’t know at all, they shouldn’t speak ever