This community doesn’t allow AI art, but I think this post would fit perfectly in !lewd_ai.

I think so, but all the stuff posted prior to the ban is still available.

I haven’t seen lolibooru.moe mentioned yet.

The player could describe what they saw, but nobody except the GM knows if it’s true.

It’s equally plausible that the paladin failed the check and saw a monster when there was only a dog, or that they passed the check and saw a monster because there was in fact a monster. Their argument to the party would be the same in either case: “that’s no dog, it’s a space station monster”.

The party then must question who saw the correct thing. Did the paladin actually see something everyone else missed? Or are they just seeing things? My point was that the players should not immediately be able to discern the truth. I find that this kind of uncertainty breeds intrigue!

I’ve never actually played, so this might be standard practice anyway, but I think this would be a great time to have the DM roll privately for each player and not tell them if they passed or failed. If the players only know what their character saw (and not if they pass or fail the check, or even get an idea based on the roll) then metagaming is impossible. This could produce a situation where it’s just a dog but the paladin thinks they saw a monster because they failed the roll, or it could be the other way around.
Doing it with DM-only rolls ensures the players have to actually figure out what they saw rather than knowing based on what they rolled or if they passed.

As I said, this could be standard practice, I have no idea. But I hope it is.

If elves age slower than humans (roughly 10x slower in most fantasy settings), is she actually 100 years old? Hmm.

There’s just something about girls who hold rulers to their bodies like that…

Peekaboo

I wanted to see if I could get any results with a slightly different prompt. I think the body shapes are better but it seems to be lacking the softer style of your gen, which I think I prefer. Mine looks like any old gen in a sea of other gens.

masterpiece, high quality, negative_hand, a group of beautiful little 8yo girls, multiple girls, (loli:1.2), wearing pantyhose, topless, tiny breasts, flat chest, blushing, happy, legs, {blonde|brown|pink|platinum} hair, (stylized:0.7), (digital art:0.7).
Negative prompt: easynegative,  negative_hand-neg, badhandv4, Unspeakable-Horrors-24v, skirt, mature, adult, portrait, animal ears, (1girl:1.2), large breasts, big boobs.
Steps: 40, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 2, Size: 768x512, Model hash: 812cd9f9d9, Model: Anything-V3.0-pruned-fp16, Denoising strength: 0.6, Clip skip: 4, Hires upscale: 2, Hires upscaler: Latent, TI hashes: "negative_hand: 73b524a2da12", Version: v1.5.1

Honorable mention for when I forgot to add “standing up” but it worked pretty nicely anyway.

masterpiece, high quality, negative_hand, a group of beautiful little 8yo girls, standing up, pinup, multiple girls, (loli:1.2), wearing pantyhose, topless, tiny breasts, flat chest, blushing, happy, (legs:1.2), full body shot, {blonde|brown|pink|platinum} hair, (stylized:0.7), (digital art:0.7).
Negative prompt: easynegative, negative_hand-neg, badhandv4, Unspeakable-Horrors-24v, skirt, mature, (adult:1.2), (teen:1.1), portrait, animal ears, (1girl:1.2), large breasts, big boobs.
Steps: 40, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 3317893774, Size: 768x512, Model hash: 812cd9f9d9, Model: Anything-V3.0-pruned-fp16, Denoising strength: 0.6, Clip skip: 4, Hires upscale: 2, Hires upscaler: Latent, TI hashes: "negative_hand: 73b524a2da12", Version: v1.5.1

I think their bodies are a little too long for their legs too. Usually legs are roughly half a person’s height, I think?

This seems like actual art. The hands aren’t great, but they also aren’t as bad as AI hands.

Giving “Feddit” a whole new meaning

If she’s unable to move after casting explosion, can she give consent? 🤔

Based foxgirl enjoyer

Yeah, that’s the one. Keeping that pretty high will only change the image a slight bit, and should therefore keep OP’s image mostly intact (with the added benefit of being processed at a higher resolution)

But what would the taste be? 🤔

I suppose that would explain why it’s hiding!

We kinda do already! !pregnanthentai@burggit.moe isn’t specifically for lolis but it definitely allows them, so I don’t see the point in a separate new community when this one already exists.

Lemmy is my first foray into fedi, I’ve never actually used Mastodon. I guess they have some kind of reputation?

Good lord, the content behind those tags is a cesspit.