• 47 Posts
  • 1.32K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle








  • You ask this like we don’t know the answer. We had the draft in living memory.

    We need a proclamation of a call to war before parliament 90 days before it can be activated. The government needs parliamentary approval from both houses. All Australian residents 18-60 can be called up (not only men in the 21st century) but the government can call up a subset of this cohort (‘only men’, ‘only women with red hair’, ‘only residents of Bankstown’ or whatever ‘class’ they wish).

    Then everyone loses their shit, we storm our politicians and threaten them with being the first to war or something if they even think of voting this in. It would be so wildly unpopular and I can’t see any government passing it.

    It’s not something the PM or Governor General can unilaterally do. Hooray for checks on politicians in Australia.






  • I don’t think there’s a realistic way to measure that.

    First of all, comparing sales of five-year-old games on PC to what’s going on in console land is unfair. Also, just how much does it cost them to port a game to PC and sell it? It’s gotta be cheaper than making the game to start with.

    A significant portion of that $300 Million is pure gravy. I’m unlikely to buy a PlayStation, but I’ve bought four Sony titles so far and will likely buy a couple more. If they want my money, they need to come to where I shop.




  • I was speaking of conventional warfare - which is what it would take for a “third front” to be necessary. There’s a huge difference between the assorted military operations we’ve seen in my lifetime and total warfare. Even in Vietnam, the major powers held back. The USA hasn’t actually declared war on a country since 1942.

    If the USA actually decides to go all-in on a country, that country is in for a bad time. Even if that country is China. That said, any nation that invades China is also in for a bad time. The very idea of such a war is horrendous.





  • The Collins project taught us that building submarines is not trivial. And that was starting with another country’s R&D (Sweden). We also have no clue how to make a nuclear submarine.

    While there issues with the French Barracuda subs, I think we should have had an open conversation with the French instead of secretly entering into the AUKUS pact. The French do have nuclear tech, so using that as an excuse to change after we’d asked them to make us diesel subs is a bit rich. I don’t know whether that’d have made nuclear subs, but I know it would have been something we could have asked about.