• 11 Posts
  • 635 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 5th, 2024

help-circle







  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldGNU-Linux
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My guess: it’s a mouthful and not catchy. “Linux” is short, catchy and easy to pronounce. With “GNU/Linux” I don’t even know if I’m supposed to spell out the GNU or pronounce it as a word, and I don’t know if I’m supposed to say the “/” as “slash” or “plus” or “and” or if it should actually just be silent. I like to type how I speak, so if I don’t know how to say it I’m not going to write it, and I’m not going to like reading it.

    I can totally see the merits for “GNU/Linux” but don’t underestimate the importance of catchiness. Maybe if it were shortened to “Ginux” it could stand a better chance, but then we’d have another gif situation.












  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.detoScience Memes@mander.xyzElsevier
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    No point discussing this if neither of us is going to prove it one way or the other.

    Bitmaps are actually a key part of what I was thinking about, so you agree with me there it seems. There’s also the issue of using the wrong paper size. .IIRC Windows usually defaults to Letter for printing even in places where A4 is the only common size and no one has heard of Letter, and most people don’t realise their prints are cropped/resized. This would still apply when printing to PDF.


  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.detoScience Memes@mander.xyzElsevier
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    They maintain a high quality but not lossless.

    As a trivial example, if you use the wrong paper size (like Letter instead of A4) then it might crop parts of the page or add borders or resize everything. Again I’ll admit, in 99% of cases it doesn’t matter, but it might matter if, say, an embedded picture was meant to be exactly to scale.


  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.detoScience Memes@mander.xyzElsevier
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    You are arguing that Elsevier shouldn’t exist at all, or needs to be forcibly changed into something more fair and more free. I 100% agree with this.

    But my point was in general, not about Elsevier but about all digital publications of any kind. This includes indie publications and indie games. If an indie developer makes a game, and it gets bought maybe 20 copies but pirated thousands of times, do you still say “fuck that” to figuring out which “customer” shared the game?

    I agree with “fuck that” to huge publishers, and by all means pirate all their shit, but smaller guys need some way to safeguard themselves, and there’s no way to decide that small guys can use a certain tool and big guys cannot.