I just think even democrats had trouble trusting she actually stood for those things. Thats the problem. Its funny the democrats were arguing green party voters only come out and campaign every four years, when democrats seem to only have progressive values every four years.

This time they went crazy and tried to go conservative for some reason, thinking they could out republican the republicans.

They really thought republicans were reluctantly voting for trump. They really thought they could win without sacrificing all their corporate donations either.

People dont like Bethesda. The games are alright.

I agree, theres plenty of nice nature paths sandwiched between suburban sprawl, and they most certainly get cell service.

I think we need a new word for online dating versus dating folks you meet in your community. Maybe edating or something. I’d personally argue online dating is inherently dangerous for at least one party, regardless of circumstance, so whether its a hike in the woods or meeting at a coffee shop makes no difference.

Online dating is equivalent to blind dating essentially.

That dude should have known all I wanted was to fuck them! Its so obvious!

/s

If all they were offering was a chance to elect the first minority president, then complaints about DEI hire are not entirely out of hand are they?

The democrats simply can’t win if they need to be funded by corporations but earn votes from the average american who are getting fucked by those corporations.

I watched the fox interview straight through, as someone who voted for her already, and was shocked that the interviewer didnt sound like a crazy person, and kamala didnt answer a single question she was asked.

Fox and co didnt have to make her look bad, she did a great job of it sounding like a salea person or brand marketer. Trump sitting down for unscripted podcast interviews helped a ton. At least trump wasn’t hiding who he is.

Vague references to restrictions in place is fun. I’m sure they were very disruptive. We’ve all been talking about how much the biden admin is holding netenyahu back right?

I’m not arguing trump was not going to be awful, I’m arguing both sides would have justified genocide and murder one way or another. Open your eyes.

Okay now justify the cost it took to create the tool.

But look at that giant mountain in the graph! Its beautiful! Like the rockies or…another mountain I definitely know the name of! Uhhh Bahamas! I think thats one…

Anyways I like pretty graph!

They didnt reject her because she’s a woman. She was a bad candidate, just like Hilary. Bad performance, whether thats on her or her team who knows. Noones going to vote for someone purely because they think its fun to have a woman in the white house. Thats extremely low on peoples list of concerns for presidency.

Nobody operates on facts alone. Unless you were there when it happened, you have to trust a source to some degree.

Quite a lot of people just say fuck it, if its all varying degrees of shit, I’m not going to listen to any of it.

Thats how word of mouth type stuff ends up on fox news, because even they know a lot of right wing Americans wont trust professional news stories over their neighbors anecdotes.

We might think we use better sources, and check into things more vigorously, but our conclusions still require faith as much as any republicans beliefs.

We still haven’t even figured out how to refute religion conclusively, for example. Juries still out on whether religion is fantasy or actual reality, whether we think thats ridiculous or not.

Fact based knowledge sounds good but could mean anything.

There is also semiautomatic modes which allow you to specify part of that triad without needing to exactly know how best to adjust all three.

I figure it depends mostly how much time you have to take your shot. Though im not sure how fast someone can get with manual mode with practice.

People who are in an excited emotional state just aren’t going to do well thinking that stuff through.

I’m not immune to it either, I just dont have tiktok or facebook at all to avoid it.

Was sarcasm my bro.

Maybe maybe not.

Okay if its about men who say that, why are the news articles about boys saying it.

And no this isnt rape. Rape is rape. Shit talk is shit talk or whatever you want to call it.

The point I’m making is that people shouldnt assume a story has merit simply because its being written about in a news paper. They aren’t choosing stories based on merit, they are picking them based on revenue.

Its telling that most of the stories leave out Nick Fuentes name, or else people wouldnt click it because they know thats his schtick to begin with.

Good one.

You must be one of the good americans then, bravo!

Not necessary with the candidates and policies the democrats are doomed to follow.