Authoritarian systems with lots of power in few hands are risky. Can happen in capitalist systems aswell, but have there been any non authoritarian communist nations?
Authoritarian systems with lots of power in few hands are risky. Can happen in capitalist systems aswell, but have there been any non authoritarian communist nations?
So you are saying you dont get better healthcare in the US than say, UK, if you have a good healthcare insurance?
I live with socialized healthcare, its nice. Especially for the poor, who would not be getting any without it. But you get random doctor that might be good or not very good. Some medicine you wont get cause its too expensive to procure. In the us, it seems if you got good coverage, you get better healthcare than pretty much all countries with socialized healthcare today. But i dont live in the us, so i dont know
Ceo seems lik a horribly stressfull job, and they got investors beathing down their neck, ready to replace them if their growth plan dont pan out. They do got sweet pay though.
socialized healthcare will still be better at popular diseases. None of the approaches are particularly good for rare disease sufferers. But socialized is not a silver bullet.
How can you be so sure?
Nah, seen plenty monstrous teenagers with decent parents. But with monster parent its more likely monster teenagers.
But maybe your right, i cant see inside homes, maybe all monster teenagers have parental deficiencies.
Hmm, who decides when they have too much area, and stops them from not following rules?
But you can throw people out of your community? Then some communities will be a lot better off than others
If i care for area for years, build, plant etc, someone else can come take it?
Last season was painfully bad
Most right wingers seem to be against polluting nature and ocean though, its the co2 stuff thats a harder sell
Why do you think im against trans people? Im not, the poster above complained about missinfo while saying its fully reversrble.
More than suicide yes, but the science is not there to be able to say its basically reversible. It will have an effect being without sex hormones during when you should have started puberty. Im not against the treatment, it just sounds ridicolous to say its will have no impact on your boodys development.
Yeah that is good for them. It just seems wrong to say its reversible.
So delaying or stopping puberty, for how long? your body will turn out exactly like if you had not delayed/stopped hormones?
Thats not what im saying. But if you were to change sweden to communism now, say the communism party wins. Would that be successful?
Havent pretty much all communist nations been very authoritarian? Not all capitalist nations are authoritarian