Reporter: @airportline@lemmy.ml

Reason: what the actual fuck is wrong with this person?

שלום. אני יהודי אשכנזי, והעברית שלי פשוטה. למדתי את זה בקיץ במחנה. אני שמח לפגוש אותך. אם הבנתי לא נכון, אני מצטער

cry more reactionaries

I simply violate the law

16 and 30, whilst barely scraping the line of legality (depending on your location, at that), is colloquially understood to be pedophilia. I don’t see why an accusation that details lines such as:

She alleges he referred to her as “the child” during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship

shouldn’t have a CW for pedophilia, as even if it’s not technically breaking the law, it is clear that there is an alleged power imbalance that is identical to one of a pedophilic relationship. Does that seem sound?

edit: lmao never mind, to the gulag with you

@Oddbin@lemm.ee care to explain your reasoning why this is ‘needlessly clickbait’? it’s quite literally the article headline with a content warning.

go rewatch harry potter. stop posting because you suck at it.

changed my pfp because I found cooler art of fem!shulk, think it fits better

the terminally online liberal has sent in a silly letter; we shall neither print it nor reply to it

I’ve come to the conclusion that federated users who show their ass with a weird explicit antagonism towards this site just don’t deserve the precious bytes of data storage it takes to federate their content

they’re just cross-site wreckers. at this point, i give them no quarter

even funnier

If a single hexbear user is participating in this (which I sincerely doubt, and honestly refuse to lend any bit credence towards, and yet I indulge this fantastical hypothetical nonetheless) they will immediately be site-banned for 1984 years. CSAM is reprehensible and is not tolerated. I truly doubt this is the case. If Hexbear is occupying this kind of space in your brain, I would wholeheartedly recommend you and meet some people.