Dmitri Smirnov, KGB.

Biden was the accelerationist candidate all along.

Read Lenin looking for specifically the names of people he’s dunking on, then look those people up and take their exact stances.

While you’re doing it, also look for stuff Lenin said that you can take out of context, like, “Lenin said you should participate in bourgeois democracy so that means you have to vote blue no matter who.”

No I’m not trying to trick trolls into reading Lenin, what would make you think that

A part of me wonders if this is some kind of 5th dimensional chess where Biden actually wants him to criticize him to muddle the narrative when he’s actually giving him everything he wants.

Neither, really. They were banned for “sustained hostility,” a fair bit after that big thread where they got dogpiled. They got into the mindset of “me against the site” and got really combative over every little thing, always looking to pick fights and push contentious angles. I had a bit more sympathy for them than most, but at a certain point getting them off the site was probably better for them.

The final straw was that they started going around saying stuff like: “he/him, man detected, opinion discarded,” but it was really more about the sustained hostility.

Liberalsocialist truly was one of the posters of all time.

I’ve even tried to HELP vegans by giving them useful tips on how to advance their cause, like, “Never bring it up under any circumstances,” or, “Stop making people feel bad by bringing up the consequences of their actions,” or, “Why don’t you try eating meat sometimes in order to be more relatable to non-vegans?” But they never listen to me! It’s like they completely write off what I’m saying just because I fundamentally disagree with everything they stand for and all of my advice essentially boils down to “Shut up and go sit quietly in a corner.” Clearly this proves that they don’t actually care about advancing their cause and just want to congratulate themselves and feel like they’re better than everyone just because they’re objectively reducing the amount of suffering in the world.

SERFS UP

I’m in Druiddos trading booty for violence (it’s consensual)(I’m a masochist)

I actually remember when I was studying abroad Japan many years ago and I was doing some kind of presentation about our home ecologies and I brought up that kudzu was this big problem where I’m from and some Japanese students were just like, “But why don’t you just eat it?” and I was just like

Oh god, if this becomes widely available we’re going to get so many takes where some smoothbrain on Twitter tricks the model into saying something ridiculous and then presents it as China’s ideology.

This is complete nonsense. To prove even one of the points they’re making, they’d need at least as much evidence and analysis as the entire thread. They’re just cherry-picking random pieces of data and jumping from one case to the next, acting as if they’ve sufficiently proven each one in turn. It’s just a gish gallop.

Probably the most absurd piece of “evidence” they present is the picture of the night sky of the USSR, which is correlated with the number of prisoners from various areas. Because both of those are correlated with total population, obviously. This is literally their sole piece of evidence regarding the question of whether “elites bounced back” in the USSR, before moving on to the next point!

The next point is about the landed gentry in the South after the abolition of slavery. Everything they say about this is irrelvant because there was never any attempt to eliminate these people as a class. There was no land reform or anything like that, and because of it, freed slaves sometimes found themselves in a position where they had little choice but to keep working for their former slavers, for a wage. Of course the rich “bounced back” from that.

This is how conspiracy theories work. You find one extremely tenuous piece of evidence that shows how a major event validates what you want to believe, then, without any consideration of other explanations for the evidence, or other evidence that might invalidate your conclusion, you immediately move on to the next thing.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Tagline this immediately.

Beautiful, no notes.

Really passing on the opportunity to coin “Eurbisexual” smh

Problematic kink, he’s literally just