I checked the news in my country and they say it’s illegal here on the ground that the supreme court ruled “the toxicity is public knowledge.”

Stupidity…

Reddit for reference

You almost had me

I mean, if you argue that way during the interview I’d pass… Nobody thinks you’re asked to do all that in a one-day interview.

Yes, the Socratic method

The hearing, entitled “The U.S. Technology Fueling Russia’s War in Ukraine: How and Why,”

I sometimes think US politicians make them sound like high schoolers yet to receive higher education.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz is reportedly against sending Taurus missiles to Kyiv because he fears the move will draw Germany into the war.

They’re still arguing that nonsense… Putin won’t care about anything. If Germany doesn’t supply enough weapons, they’ll be dragged into the war in a worse way.

Worried House Republicans are looking to Johnson for plans for keeping their majority after record-low productivity for this Congress. Instead, he is offering thoughts and prayers.

The one time a Republican politician sent serious thoughts and prayers lmao

What an excellent scheme to keep talents away from entering the red states for a job.

Agreed.

Exactly what I feel about HTML after using QML.

Although there are already comments with good libs, you could also look into services like Weebly.

deleted by creator

I’m from Japan. They don’t even have judges as corrupt as SCOTUS and still don’t allow same sex marriage because the ruling party is conservative. Well, the court ruled it’s unconstitutional, but we learned that a law in this country can stay unconstitutional if the government ignores the situation. And apparently 90% of the people (at least on the internet) support that because they are conservative.

Makes me realize how broken my country is. It doesn’t even count as corruption because it’s lawful. Fucking hell…

Nah, that’s rather what right wingers do.

Sometimes I wonder if POTUS could declare national emergency due to an unhinged SCOTUS.

Maybe even that depends on the judges.

I noticed. What I wanted to say was it can become a battle between the correct belief and the wrong belief. Especially if the law itself is interpreted wrongly and scientific evidence is difficult to acquire (which sometimes is).

Also, they often don’t read more than a few lines. I applied as a dev for a company which I had many friends inside. They all knew my skills. The problem was the high-level managers because they didn’t read the memo (and didn’t even read my CV), assumed I can’t do engineering because I was an academic at the time.

an engineering manager said during an interview, “OK, we’re going to build a To Do List app right now,” a process that might normally take weeks.

Tbf you can do that in one day with ChatGPT, although it requires some generic software engineering skills. But that’s the point.

Even if you don’t complete the task, the process of coding can prove your skill level in a positive way.

IANAL, but I dare guess judges do need beliefs. In the beginning, people thought Black people were not humans, and so equality of people in constitution did not apply. I might be factually wrong on this, but let’s assume it. To overcome this, some judges had to abandon their racism and understand black people are people.

And while some areas of human issues can be discussed scientifically, like racism being completely wrong, some are difficult.

And if science can’t overcome an unjust law today, judges have to listen to their heart and do the right thing. Probably the left thing these days, though…