booty [he/him]

  • 6 Posts
  • 1.19K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 11th, 2020

help-circle











  • I just figured it was worth pointing out in case you hadn’t seen it—apologies if it came off as passive aggressive or anything.

    No worries!

    Because they’re using part of the place the mortgage pays for

    Yes, temporarily. And when the mortgage is paid, OP owns the house forever and can, as always, kick out those who paid the mortgage any time. Or just keep extorting them for personal gain. Either way, they don’t get shit.

    Otherwise OP could just store stuff in the bedroom, have family stay there, etc.

    Exactly why I don’t really like the argument that OP “isn’t that bad” or is “not like the other landlords” or “isn’t gaining anything” or whatever. The reason OP doesn’t just store stuff in the bedroom, or have family stay there, or whatever is because OP is exploiting another person for personal gain. He is acting according to his own material interests, leeching another person’s hard-earned money to pay for his house. OP even describes the amount of rent he is charging as “market rate.” He’s literally just another landlord, no different from the perspective of his tenant from any other landlord in the area. (except that he thinks he’s a superhero with a secret identity. leech man! lurks in the bathtub and sucks your blood while you’re not looking)

    I feel like I accidentally fell asleep and now I’m just in some kind of dream where all of hexbear forgot why being a landlord is bad.




  • or if the profit is directly covering basic needs that his job isn’t enough to cover.

    If only his victim were given the same consideration.

    Look, I don’t give a shit about theft on principle. Steal from corporations if you need to, or if it would make life easier, or just for fun. I don’t care about that. But stealing from your fellow worker is unacceptable, especially one that is indisputably worse off than yourself. I bet OP’s tenant would love to be in such a position that they could purchase a home and have to worry about things like whether leeching from the working class earns you the wall (it does)

    Again if OP is just covering the expenses incurred by the tenant/roommate then whatever, but if there’s profit involved then I’ve got nothing in common with him


  • I mean if you’re not profiting and are literally just covering the extra expenses incurred by having a second person living in your home, first of all why? I mean it’s nice and all but I’m just suspicious of acts of charity like that (and certainly wouldn’t assume that that is what’s happening instead of the much more likely option)

    And second, if you are performing that act of charity, why would you feel guilty or wonder if you’re getting the wall? If I were doing that I wouldn’t consider myself a landlord or feel any guilt for it at all. That’s called having a roommate. I guess on paper legally you’re still the landlord but it’s a different thing ethically.