I’m going to get that last one. “What’s on your arm?“ ‘oh it’s just a third of it’ put my three arms together
I’m going to get that last one. “What’s on your arm?“ ‘oh it’s just a third of it’ put my three arms together
That’s the only cool input there I can imagine. Good on that defender!
How’d this guy get lawyered up in the first place?
He complain on an NRA Facebook group, and greed took it from there?
Imagine knowing you could fight for some BS in exchange for at BEST having “<Your Name> beats his wife and wins case” all over the headlines.
Them little local brands tho
<reciprocal affirmation>
This FTC has the balls for it, too.
Amazon. Apple. Who’s next?
LLMs are useless! Why is Apple integrating ChatGPT?!
“Why do you hate trans people?”
The employment of a large language model, such as the one utilized in this scenario, can prove to be remarkably advantageous. It possesses the remarkable capacity to transform the provided text into multiple submissions that convey an aura of authenticity, while adhering to the principle of verbosity. This approach allows for the generation of a substantial quantity of content with a minimal investment of human resources and effort.
Engaging the services of an advanced language model represents a highly valuable asset in this particular context. Such models exhibit the remarkable ability to reformulate the given input in a manner that not only maintains an air of legitimacy but also embraces the principle of verbosity. This capability enables the effortless generation of numerous unique submissions, thereby optimizing the utilization of human resources.
The utilization of a large-scale language model in this scenario can be deemed a highly effective and efficient approach. These sophisticated systems possess the remarkable aptitude to transform the provided text into multiple submissions that uphold a sense of legitimacy and authenticity, while simultaneously adhering to the principles of verbose and detailed expression. This approach allows for the generation of a substantial volume of content with a minimal investment of human effort and involvement.
A comparison between two political figures, Elizabeth and Bernie, on whether cats can have salami. On the left, the image shows a smiling woman (Warren) with the caption “cats should only eat cat food”. On the right, the image shows an older man (Sanders) with the caption “cats can have a little salami”. The image is presented in a mock election-style format, with the question “Elizabeth or Bernie?” at the top, suggesting that voters should compare the two candidates on this issue.
You’re right
A cake with a message written on it in pink text that says “DID IT HURT? when I told you to SearXNG IT and I was right.” The cake is decorated with swirls of white frosting and colorful sprinkles around the edges.
I see it as a way of visually presenting (character, year) data points.
Yeah but it’ll run over the kid with its CAMERAS and NO OTHER SENSORS. Just like drunk maniacs human drivers with their real bigbrains and real eyes.
look at picture
read title
zoom into picture
begin to scroll away
see the community it’s posted on -> lol
…Latino, Latina, Latinx community…
-NPR
(Actually can make sense when you include all three cuz enby)
Feel it. Sometimes prefer a video in certain circumstances. Those who offer both are tops.
A limited, imperfect solution: add “transcript” after YouTube in the URL.
Can try to use control/command F to find relevant parts.
Ahaha
Hey should NSFW that link just in case
I <3 old vet John
Also anybody reading this:
go make something of yourself
If retail is your final form that’s OK too!
This ends with $500/mo Netflix subscriptions. An employee comes to your house and holds a laptop up in front of your couch while looking for hidden cameras camming the show.
Bathroom breaks are allowed, but they’ll pause the show.
Je suis matchy