Isn’t matomo like, literally fire-and-forget?

But also, my main draw from this, is that the simplest solution to analytics is to just not need to profile people (let alone your interlocutors) in the first place. Just like with traffic and transportation problems.

Nice machine, by the way. a Linux box (of course it is).

Well now either that’s passive-aggressive or aggressive-passive.

If it was written only the day before there’s no way the model was trained on that data.

[citation needed]

lInUx iS uNsAfE!!!11111onememe

looks inside

requires surviving an UIF in the first place

already fixed past 6.12.

Rust copaganda

AI-assisted vuln research

Yeah… no. Just one more idiot trying to gain clicks for their linkedin profile.

discord

Into the trash bin it goes.

but does every other post have to be about some political shit on the all tab,

There’s a reason it’s called the “All” tab and not the “Some” tab, and even then it’s mostly making an effort.

The fediverse stuff is already set on the tooling for that. Set your feed view away from All to, say, Subscribed, and block the stuff you don’t like.

lemmygrad because they are perceived as tankies / commies, and thus get all the kneerjerk reaction from the people who are unwilling to apply the same standards to the US, the EU or Israel.

Hexbear, honestly no idea.

Saying you have dropped your support for things like fair wages and human rights because you can’t bother to learn to distinguish how that’s different from the right-wing has made me more right-wing, is not the win you seem to think it is.

nifty strongly curved arrows

I should sort my ties this way…

Before Apple fanboys and bootlickers come about, let’s quote the relevant part of the article:

After the first order, the company reacted by removing the ability of U.K. users to use ADP.

They are not fighting to your benefit; they are fighting for you (as a product).

“Centrism” in modern politics is “being too ashamed to admit of being right-wing”.

Ultimately, fewer defederations, more acceptance of differing opinions, and being welcoming of users who aren’t interested in politics

The problem is those two are strongly tied to the idea that the people who come here have to be respectful enough. The people who first populated these places did it to escape from things like capitalism, right-wing nutjobs and the like; saying only “oh we have to be more accepting of difering opinions” basically puts the blame on the victim.

As for the subjects that are not politics, we have cats and beans. That should suffice.

if user A circulates cat pictures, user B circulates dog pictures, and user C circulates both, can user A block dog pictures from B and C, but still see user C’s cat pictures?

To do that, you need either a system of trust where you trust someone else to tell you which images from C are dogs and which ones are cats (as well as a policy for what to do when a picture contains both), or an automated system that will scan all the messages and perform that determination for you.

Of course they are interested now, when it affects a white man…

The people of this pubnix are grateful.

This is one of the problems with relying on AI… it can produce an overwhelming amount of content with errors and inaccuracies throughout. If you don’t review and know the content yourself, you won’t know what it got wrong.

Yep, and this induces anyone who wants to review the resulting slop to need to turn to AI as well to even deal with the amount (or dismiss as a whole).

AI is a viral infection on software development.

If the developer would not have disclosed, I would not have known, so whether I’m happy or not is not relevant. We can’t and don’t (currently) trace the bill of materials of everything we use at home, either. I don’t know how many previous owners does my toaster have.

Like it or not, AI tools are here to stay

Oh look it’s the accelerationism thought-terminating cliché!

AI usage is viral. AI is only “here to stay” in that because the weight of the “”“content”“” generated by people who use it, it forces other people to turn to AI itself to deal with the sheer amount of the sloppage. But we don’t have to accept that, and the clearer our posture regarding that, the better. We can commit to process things at human speeds, on human schedules. After all, in Open Source and in Free Software we don’t owe anyone instantaneousness.

There is no “right way” to use AI, only “less bad enough for you to shut up your conscience”. It was designed to undervalue humans and give wealth privileged access to skill, built with intellectual and wage theft, and is still powered by the death of the planet and those, sapient or not, who live in it.

I don’t, but I do know it’s those pedos who make the surveillance and the laws about it.

So come on, what are you waiting for? Go be useful.

That’s too many!

We should summarize them into one standard that everyone follows.