Or the only person who phrases your issue this way) so many times I’ve found out that I just state my problem in an unusual way

It’s the built in iOS weather app

Thank you! At least I don’t see orange skies yet

Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out

Economics: How much are you willing to pay?

Smarter you in a few years ;)

I’m with you on that. My comment was more like sometimes the appendices seem to get out of hand. They probably contain entire papers there.

No need to rush to conclusions, I do read appendices when needed. My point is not that authors should cut the appendices or compromise on any other good open science practices. The point is that disproportionately large appendices make one wonder if some of that stuff actually belongs in the main text. If it is just a robustness check that gives a similar result, fine, make a footnote in the main text and put the analysis in the appendix. But what if it is actually relevant information that changes the perception of the main text?

Shoot up

Thanks for the insight!

Yes, just checked)

Why did they replace bash with zsh?

I’d like to see a person who applies for a gun license and needs to show that they are trustworthy and then says “and I am also going to cary a corpse in my car”

In the US it’s not only drinking but even carrying an exposed bottle of alcohol. Which is why in some places liquor stores are called package stores (if I recall correctly), because they package the bottle in a brown bag.

I wonder how they define “trustworthy” here and why is trust so important for this task

A free jail-break attempt card

I should have thought about that one, of course

Clever

Just learned about this today)

The bladder tells the balls that it’s time