Turns outs not amazing but we still out number them.

Before proton we used wine. And wine will continue development with or without steam.

If anything the open source community did more and gave steam a firm platform to build on.

Edit: And to add an observation steams push for Linux is a reaction to Microsoft becoming a contender in the PC games market place. Its not for our benefit anymore than for valves.

i believe they are working on adding the mass bit, the thing with nazis though is the mass comes way later, first they build a strong SS.

definitely, sadly i’ve lost this liberty with new paper articles and demos :/

down-votes suck but i wouldn’t get too hung up on it. i got two on my response one was a bot that down-voted any mention of “labour” throughout this community.

libertarians where originally a leftist movement, but like dubstep, America ruined it /s

I’m sure they like the freedom not so much the price though but if what sabreW4K3 has said were in action renting would still be possible the only difference is cost and who you rent from. renting would be far cheaper. landlords could be abolished and replaced with housing maintenance where they work for the tenants and local area in upkeep.

deleted by creator

wont happen, only way to get what we want is through a classless society. we lived through millionaires and things were okay but with their millions they could secure billions: money is power and while what you say is a better outcome for our current time its not a sustainable one for the future.

Thank you, will sort this.

At its face what you say sounds correct but in actuality the division is inherent between worker and boss (repressor and repressed) whereas nationals vs’s migrants is manufactured.

A legal precedent should be established to hold companies as large as CrowdStrike liable for their actions. This liability should be significant enough to ensure that future companies will think twice before releasing faulty code. We should not be asking for or supporting Microsoft’s efforts to further lock down their product.

But unlike rail etc. Renationalising Royal Mail would be bloody expensive. And not raise much revenue.

I advocate for only paying the profiteers the true value of the company without speculation while also taking into account the money made. Thames water as an example has made billions while doing little to modernise and in this regard we won’t pay much.

Of course the cost is something we need to pay. As much as the Internet etc has rep.aced much of the need. Cheap mail delivery to non profitable rural areas is still something we need as a society. And needs to be funded.

And if we look at private sector transport, no profitable routes get shut down essentially killing villages.

Tolpuddle martyrs festival? Sadly missed this talk.

This is quite silly

deleted by creator

edit booth

Often I download just to seed but only when I know the uploaders

It’s not a criticism grounded in reality; rather, it comes across as condescending and hyperbolic. In debates clarity is essential. I’ve chosen to exercise my democratic right to protest by spoiling my vote. Under the current political system, I see our society failing, and the available parties do not offer solutions. Spoiling my vote was my civic duty.

Both of your statements seem hyperbolic rather than coherent arguments. Choosing to vote is democratic, and your first statement about the minimum requirement makes no sense as, again, you’re speaking hyperbolically. I’ll leave this here, as you seem to lack political imagination and speak like a caricature.