• 0 Posts
  • 59 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 24th, 2023

help-circle









  • $50,000 is a life changing amount of money for everyone I’ve ever met. Hell $10,000 is.

    If the regulations are so stringent as to prevent people doing this for monetary reasons, then why are we even discussing money?

    This is just smoke and mirrors to get around the fact that only people who need the money will sell their kidneys. Do you think Jeff Bezos will be jumping at the opportunity to sell his kidney?

    And if there’s not enough monetary incentive, then we’re right back where we started anyway.

    I don’t think it’s a reach to say that we should prioritize universal healthcare, universal housing, or universal food access before opening the market up for kidneys.

    Way more people die a year due to not having proper medical insurance (in the US) than due to kidney failure. More difficult to get estimates for the lethality caused by food or housing insecurity, but it doesn’t take much imagination to see how these factors contribute to negative health outcomes. And these solutions not only save lives without exploiting anyone, but also raise the quality of life for everyone.






  • Yeah sorry wasn’t really trying to engage on that point about biocomputers, just put it there to make sure we are on the same page on soul. Just always has an otherworldly connotation in my head that feels the need to distinguish humans as somehow separate from the rest of the world. I didn’t really take it that way from your post, but I hate the word soul and I’m just really pedantic idk.

    You bring up a good point about the distinction between art and beauty. I think I really like the way you frame that. Something I’ll definitely have to ponder about.


  • Idk I feel like there’s piece of the puzzle missing here. I think art can be found anywhere where someone wants to find it, if that makes any sense. In nature, in random odd places, the universe itself. Im just not sure if a “soul” (ignoring the fact that souls aren’t real and humans are just biocomputers) is really necessary for art to be real.

    It implies a level of intent that I don’t think the perceiver has to be cognizant of in order to appreciate a work of art. The implication here seems that unless an artist’s intent is fully understood by the audience that we can’t really fully appreciate it as art.

    Also while people generating prompts isn’t art in itself, I feel like it kind of begins prying away at this notion of there being no human behind the creation in the first place.

    I think the most straightforward example is something like the work of a collage artist. There is already this practice of grabbing many different things from different places, other art, pictures, objects, whatever, and it’s the specific combination of these things which gives it this special kind of “intent”.

    I of course agree with all of your other points about the way AI generated art impacts society.


  • I feel like it’s only possible to come across as heavy handed if the satire is objectively less subtle than reality. In a world where climate science has shown us our future for decades now and people continue to bury their head in the sand, it’s really just documentary about what would genuinely happen if a large scale disaster were to occur. I wouldn’t say it’s a particularly clever metaphor, but I think you can’t satirize climate change denial hard enough at this point.