• 361 Posts
  • 3K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle



  • requires a fair bit of post-installation configuration (suboptimal OOTB experience for newbies)

    I’m not the biggest fan of Gnome’s defaults but the regular, non-techie users want a browser (maybe Chrome instead of Firefox, depending on preference) and possibly Steam for gaming. Both are on Flathub, available from Gnome Software.

    Less software availability compared to Ubuntu or Mint

    The software that isn’t available, isn’t of interest to newbie/non-techie users.

    More likely to break than Ubuntu or Mint

    If anything causes breakage, it’s those web tutorials telling inexperienced users to add a bunch of PPAs to do shit. “So you use Ubuntu but video playback is a big laggy on your super new, hardly upstream-supported Radeon graphics card? Easy, add this PPA with untested git snapshots of Mesa and Kernel.” Yeah, no.


  • the non LTS kernels often cause issues

    In 10 years of using Fedora (granted: my current main Linux system is SteamOS but I do have hardware running Fedora as well but with Gnome as desktop in that case) I once had a kernel-related bug, IIRC involving some fairly new AMD hardware.

    KDE is currently unstable again (while it worked perfectly on Plasma 6.0)

    Unless you’d be so kind to point me to a direction that showed that your instability is because of Fedora and not some bug that suck into Plasma 6.1, you’d have the same bug under any other distribution with Plasma 6.1.




  • if you’re really a complete noob the best experience will be the one you can Google and get a working answer as easily as possible.

    Those Ubuntu “as easily as possible” answers on the web often revolve around adding random PPAs which cause breakage over time, especially the more PPAs are mixed and mashed. If anything, those easy answers from random Ubuntu forums and websites, last updated 2014, cause more harm than good.






  • We’re talking about Android, unrar doesn’t have anything to do with this really.

    The entire topic is about RAR archive support on Android, so of course the freely available source code of unrar, released by the RAR developer himself, has absolutely to do with everything here.

    RAR is and will continue to be a proprietary format with an owner who can seek royalties.

    Nope, unrar’s source code is free, released by RAR’s developer.

    It’s like saying Google should stop licensing MPEG because ffmpeg exists—it simply doesn’t work like that

    Nope, it absolutely isn’t like that. You just have no clue at all.

       Unrar source may be used in any software to handle RAR archives
       without limitations free of charge, but cannot be used to re-create
       the RAR compression algorithm, which is proprietary. Distribution
       of modified Unrar source in separate form or as a part of other
       software is permitted, provided that it is clearly stated in
       the documentation and source comments that the code may not be used
       to develop a RAR (WinRAR) compatible archiver.
    

    It’s not FOSS, given that it comes with the provision that no RAR compressor can be created based on unrar source code but for browsing and extracting RAR archives, the unrar source code as is is absolutely fine.