znonymous [comrade/them, love/loves]

deleted by creator

True. It was for me. Noam Chomsky is a little inscrutable at first, but a good example of the ethos perspective.

Being raised in the states by parents who used “Commie” as a cuss made it a difficult indoctrination to overcome to even consider the notion of a people’s state requirement first before any chance at utopia.

But then I joined a Communist Minecraft server last summer and joined Hexbear and Lemmygrad and now I wonder what took me so long to come around.

I think the biggest obstacle for me personally was the notion of means-to-an-end based morality being dangerous, and how it can be used to justify any atrocity.

But stuff like gulaging unrepentant landlords is obviously justifiable lol.

Parenti is awesome.

Libertarian Socialism is effectively the end game of Communism, from what I understand of Marx’s meaning by the eventual “withering away of the state”.

Unfortunately, the ethos adherents are typically just a bunch of theory illiterate very onliners who like the idea of not paying taxes and doing whatever they like, but also, trying to still be humanists.

They are skipping all the hard work steps, which involve revolutionary solidarity and action which deliberately dismantles the structures which protect capitalist power. Anarcho-Syndicalists completely ignored that the people who have monopolized capital will fight tooth and nail to maintain and preserve their privileges. They will murder using war and police without remorse.

Libertarian Socialists will try to both-sides the state monopoly on violence. This is a false equivalency logical fallacy. The Capitalist state will do extra-judicial murder all the time in order to protect their hoards. They are anti-human dragons. The Communist state is explicitly pro-human, and uses violence to fight back or to protect and preserve the people’s revolution, because without that ever vigilant revolutionary spirit, we will again fall victim to the psychopathic greed of the anti-human Capitalist.

Is violence always bad? Sadly, it is not. Humanity was born out of a violent nature, and was raised amidst it. But humanity will have to fight for justice, and preserve it.

I have an idea. Have every single article or comment posted by a user scanned by an LLM. Prompt the LLM to identify logical fallacies in the post or comment. Post the user logical fallacies counts on a public scoreboard hosted on each federated instance. Now, ban the top 10% scoring users each quarter who have a fallacy ratio surpassing some reasonable good faith objective.

Pros: Everyone is judged by the same impassive standard.

Cons: 1) A fucking LLM has to burn coal for every stupid post we make. 2) LLM prompt injection/hijacking vulnerability.

Why not Germany?

Also, advanced medical technology, what are human lifespans by the TNG time period? I know, I know… this is not Daystrom Institute.

Too late. Early agitvoted.

/c/effort seems good