• e$tGyr#J2pqM8v
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Isn’t being proud of your sexuality mostly a response to being shamed by bigots for your sexuality? Like: parts of society look down on my sexuality? Well fuck you, I’m proud of it! If you’re not being shamed at all, isn’t a bit weird to be proud of such things? As if you did anything to become a heterosexual. No one cares, nor should they.

    • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, that is the whole point. The whole point is not “I am proud of who I am attracted to”, the point is “I am proud of being open about who I am attracted to despite the bigots and social challenges”.

      Which is why there is no “straight pride”, “blond pride”, or “high school student pride”. There is no glory in doing something that is statistically speaking, completely devoid of interest…

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        There is no glory in doing something that is statistically speaking, devoid of interest…

        Wait, I thought this was about being proud of standing up to bigots?

        Is it about being a statistical anomaly and special, or about being a progressive activist?

        Cuz I’ll tell you what pride month is to me, as a straight man. Pride month is one of many placative gestures performed by corporations in order to manipulate my empathy into buying their products. It’s a nice set of makeup that corporations get to wear while you go out and suffer the consequences. You, as someone who is a part of the LGBTQ+ community, should be painfully aware of the damaging effects that corporate usage of the pride month aesthetic has had on public perception of the people in that group.

        Yet, here you are. Concerned about establishing why you’re more fucking special than straight people.

        • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          No no, pride is not about being “special”. Nobody is special. It’s about people embracing who they are, despite having a tougher going than others.

          It’s about not staying in the closet in a country with bigots. It’s about being a woman in a working culture that favours men. It’s about going to university in a country that favours manual labour. It’s about being trans… and daring to say out loud “this is not my gender”.

          Being a white, straight, cis man is not very difficult. Being a non-white, straight, cis woman is statistically more common, but harder. Normally, “statistical anomalies” have a harder going, but this is definitely not about being special. It’s about being whoever you are, despite the adversity.

          Also, to clarify - I haven’t mentioned anything about not being straight. My sexual orientation has nothing to do with my response.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Everything you’ve said I appreciate, I fully recognize that the LGTBQ+ community should be proud of itself for the reasons you’ve listed.

            I also maintain that pride month has been perverted into something else by corporate interests. Mark my words, the longer the LGBTQ+ community adheres itself to corporations; the worse the inevitable damage will be. I have nothing else to add.

            • AngryMob@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Corporations leech off cultures and communities, sure. but that doesnt have to devalue them. Its a separate issue entirely.

              • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                I disagree, when corporations have infinitely more reach and influence you have no hope of controlling any narrative they’re a part of.

                They own pride month. The LGBTQ+ community does not.

                • roguetrick@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Fundementally as long as pride month’s story is linked to stonewall and that story is always told, pride month will always have a bigger symbolism with the counterculture than any corporate influence.

                  There’s a reason American labor day explicitly does not happen in May.

                  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Corporate influence isn’t counterculture. In fact it’s pride month that is actually counterculture.

                    I find it amusing that you’re using labor day as an example of the “control” you or anyone has over corporate narratives.

                    Your money has less purchasing power than it ever has, but we really showed them on Labor Day huh? That day that’s so important we shift the date to whenever we feel like.

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yup. This is essentially the same as people suddenly screaming about “WHITE PRIDE!!!” in response to things like Black Live Matter.

      The entire point is a minority not letting the majority shame or otherize them. The the majority freaks out and responses with “ME TO BUT BETTER THAN YOU DID IT!”.

      It’s pathetic.

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I agree with your statement, but I would like to point out that “as if you did anything to become a heterosexual” is… yikes. That implies the LGBTQ+ community is not born how they are and have to do work to become lesbian, gay, bi, etc.

      Diction is important; while that doesn’t ruin the overall argument for me because I am an ally, I don’t think that’s something to say going forward because it’s very easy to latch onto and discredit the argument as a whole.

      • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I actually meant that as: as if you did anything to become a heterosexual/homosexual/any-kind-of-sexuality.