• quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t know a lot about Namibia either.

    Confidently believing the first answer that comes to mind, when a question is posed, is the height of polisci intellect.

    Why, if Namibia is so inhospitable, did the Germans try to colonize it? Why are other deserts relatively populous? Israel for example supports a huge population. Hell even Las Vegas has like 1/4 of Namibia’s population by itself.

    • MechanizedPossum [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 months ago

      Germans didn’t just try to colonize it, but genocided hundreds of thousands of people there and the best agricultural land is still owned by settlers until this day and demanded as restitutions by the descendents of the genocide survivors, which may or may not be a reason why German think tanks are running anti-postcolonialism psyops.

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        did they colonize the sahara for the stuff in the sahara, or because to control the coasts (where people actually live), you had to control the interior, otherwise you’d have constant raids on your ports?

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          no you don’t, nobody before the colonists bothered with direct administration of the desert folk because simply trading with them and some buffer defenses could keep the coast safe.

          • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            so what did they do it for? who can paint the biggest chunk of the map to their own color? resources the sahara might have? control of trade routes to subsaharan africa?

            • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              to extract the resources, and probably a bit of pride to paint the map & connect the north with subsaharan colonies. by the time the French were colonizing africa it was faster to use boats for trade though

            • LeZero [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              At least in Algeria they have huge deposits of oil and gas in the desert

              Also the french used the desert as a test site for nuclear bombs

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Why, if Namibia is so inhospitable, did the Germans try to colonize it?

      Probably for fancy rocks n shit, or just because they can. Wouldn’t be the first time Europeans rocked up and settled in a place that the natives knew better than to bother with. Also, did the Germans really try to colonize all the parts that nobody lives in, or did they do the things Europeans usually do and actually go to where people are already living (in other words, the places that are good to live in) and kill the people who were there so they could live there instead?