Transcript for Israel-Palestine Debate: Finkelstein, Destiny, M. Rabbani & Benny Morris | Lex Fridman Podcast #418 - Lex Fridman
lexfridman.com
This is a transcript of Lex Fridman Podcast #418 with Israel-Palestine Debate. The timestamps in the transcript are clickable links that take you directly to that point in the main video. Please note that the transcript is human generated, and may have errors. Here are some useful links: Go back to this episode’s main page Watch the full YouTube version of the podcast Table of Contents Here are the loose “chapters” in the conversation. Click link to jump approximately to that part in the transcript: 0:00 – Introduction 4:42 – 1948 1:03:14 – Partition 2:07:47 – October 7 3:01:59 –

TL:DR; weird fucking debate. Israeli side shifts from counterfactuals about the past to vulgar realpolitik about the present like it’s nothing. Tightrope on an idealistic view of history and a materialistic view of the past. Fucking weird and it’s presented in a fundamentally unconvincing way where they’re basically saying “fuck international law” over and over again. I’ve spliced in some commentary bits, marked as inline code blocks. All non-contiguous bits are timestamped. This is copied from the podcast transcript.

transcript highlights

(00:32:21)
Norman Finkelstein
Okay. There’s a real problem here, and it’s been a problem I’ve had over many years of reading your work. Apart perhaps from, as grandchild, I suspect nobody knows your work better than I do. I’ve read it many times, not once, not twice, at least three times everything you’ve written. And the problem is, it’s a kind of quicksilver. It’s very hard to grasp a point and hold you to it. So we’re going to try here to see whether we can hold you to a point. And then you argue with me the point. I have no problem with that. Your name please.

Steven Bonnell
Steven Bonnell.

(00:44:48)
Mouin Rabbani
And the second, I think, impediment to that view is that long before the UN General Assembly convened to address a question of Palestine, Palestinian and Arab and other leaders as well had been warning ad infinitum that the purpose of the Zionist movement is not just to establish a Jewish state, but to establish an exclusivist Jewish state. And that transfer forced displacement was fundamental to that project. And just responding to…. Sorry, was it-

Steven Bonnell
Yeah, Steven.

Mouin Rabbani
… Bonnell or Donnel?

Steven Bonnell
Bonnell, yeah.

Mouin Rabbani
With a B?

Steven Morelli
Yeah.

(01:19:03)
Steven Bonnell
Well, yeah, can I actually respond to that? Because I think this is emblematic of the entire conversation. I watched a lot of Norm’s interviews and conversations in preparation for this, and I hear Norm will say this over and over and over again. “I only deal in facts. I don’t deal in hypotheticals. I only deal in facts. I only deal in facts.” And that seems to be the case, except for when the facts are completely and totally contrary to the particular point you’re trying to push. The idea that Jews would’ve out of hand rejected any state that had Arabs on it or always had a plan of expulsion is just betrayed by the acceptance of the ’47 partition plan.

Norman Finkelstein
I don’t think you understand politics. Did I just say that there is a chasm that separates your ideology from the limits and constraints imposed by politics and reality?

(01:22:48)
Steven Bonnell
You can say that, but in this case, the facts betray you. There was no Arab acceptance of anything that would’ve allowed for a Jewish state to exist, number one, and number two, I think that it’s entirely possible, given how things happen after a war, that this exact same conflict could have played out and an expulsion would’ve happened without any ideology at play. There was a people that disagreed on who had territorial rights to a land, there was a massive war afterwards, and then a bunch of their friends invaded after to reinforce the idea that the Jewish people in this case couldn’t have a state. There could have been a transfer regardless.

Norman Finkelstein
Anything could have been, but that’s not what history is about.

(01:24:08)
Norman Finkelstein
Okay. But we have to recognize that from nearly the beginning, for perfectly obvious reasons having nothing to do with antisemitism, anti-Westernism, anti-Europeanism, but because no people that I am aware of would voluntarily cede its country-

Steven Bonnell
Except for all the people that sold land voluntarily.

Norman Finkelstein
You can perfectly understand Native American resistance to Euro-colonialism. You can perfectly well understand it without any anti-Europeanism, anti-whiteism, anti-Christianism. They didn’t want to cede their country to invaders. That’s completely understandable.

(01:26:55)
Norman Finkelstein
I looked and looked and looked for evidence of this antisemitism as being a chief motor of Arab resistance to Zionism. I didn’t see it.

Steven Borrell
Did he make that claim?

Benny Morris
I don’t remember the word chief. It’s one of the elements.

Steven Bonnell
Yeah. It’s very binary thinking when it comes to-

Norman Finkelstein
Binary?

Steven Borrell
Yes, binary.

Norman Finkelstein
Please, don’t give me this postmodernism ‘binary’.

(01:59:24)
Steven Bonnell
But the problem is you’re saying that Husseini was his influence… You’re saying the move [inaudible 01:59:28]-

Norman Finkelstein
I don’t even understand, of all the crimes you want to ascribe to the Palestinian people, trying to blame them directly-indirectly, indirectly, or indirectly, three times the move for the Nazi Holocaust is completely lunatic.

Steven Barelli
Hold on. Wait, he’s not blaming them for the Holocaust. He’s saying that from the perspective-

Norman Finkelstein
Of course he-

Benny Morris
No, no, no.

Steven Bonnell
Wait, wait, wait, no, he’s saying that from the perspective of Jews in the region, Palestinians would’ve been part of the-

Norman Finkelstein
That’s not what he’s saying.

Steven Bonnell
That is exactly what he said.

Norman Finkelstein
You have not read him. I’ve read him.

Steven Bonnell
You’ve read him and you don’t understand him.

Norman Finkelstein
You’ve read-

Steven Morelli
He’s right here.

Norman Finkelstein
Believe me, I’m a lot more literate than you, Mr. Barelli.

Steven Bonnell
I’m going to believe the guy that wrote the stuff.

Norman Finkelstein
You read what Wikipedia said.

Steven Weaselly
That’s great, and you don’t even speak Hebrew and you call yourself an Israeli historian.

Norman Finkelstein
[inaudible 02:00:11].

Steven Bonnell
[inaudible 02:00:10] different grounds.

Mouin Rabbani
If I can just respond to you-

Steven Bonnell
No, no, I’m just saying that there were two tricks-

Norman Finkelstein
You said nothing, as you always do.

(02:16:29)
Norman Finkelstein
850, fine. So I never said that, but then I said, “No, we don’t know exactly how they were killed.” But 800 civilians killed, no, 850, no question there. And I also said on repeated occasions, there cannot be any doubt, in my opinion as of now with the available evidence, that Hamas was responsible for significant atrocities, and I made sure to include the plural.

Steven Bonnell
There’s a lot of tricky language being employed here. Do you think of the 850-

Norman Finkelstein
There’s nothing tricky. It’s called attaching value to words and not talking like a motormouth. I am very careful about qualifying because that’s what language is about.

(02:39:39)
Steven Bonnell
Can I respond to something relating to that, the Lebanon War? I looked at the book that he got this from and what the quote was from. It sounds cold to say it, but war is tragic and civilians die. There is no war that this has not happened in, in the history of all of humankind. The statement that Israel might take care not to target civilians is not incompatible with a diary entry from someone who said they saw civilians getting killed. I think that sometimes we do a lot of weird games when we talk about international humanitarian law or laws that govern conflict, but we say things like, civilians dying is a war crime, or civilian homes or hospitals getting destroyed is necessarily a war crime, or is necessarily somebody intentionally targeting civilians without making distinctions between military targets or civilian ones.

I think that when we analyze different attacks or when we talk about the conduct of the military, it’s important to understand, prospectively from the unit of analysis of the actual military committing the acts, what’s happening and what are the decisions being made rather than just saying retrospectively, “Oh, well, a lot of civilians died. Not very many military people died, comparatively speaking, so it must have been war crimes,” especially when you’ve got another side, I’ll fast-forward to Hamas, that intentionally attempts to induce those same civilian numbers, because Hamas is guilty of any war crime that you would potentially accuse. And this is according to the Amnesty International, people that Norm loves to cite, Hamas is guilty of all of these same war crimes, of them failing to take care of their civilian population, of them essentially utilizing human shields to try to fire rockets, free from attacks-

Norman Finkelstein
Essentially?

Steven Bonnell
Essentially, yes. I’m just saying that, essentially, as in terms of how international law defines it and not how Amnesty International defines it. But Amnesty International describes times of human shielding, but they don’t actually apply the correct international legal standard-

Norman Finkelstein
You don’t know what’s the correct international law-

Steven Bonnell
I know absolutely-

Norman Finkelstein
You haven’t a clue-

Steven Barelli
No, I absolutely do-

Norman Finkelstein
You haven’t a clue because you can’t find it on Wikipedia. You can’t find it on Wikipedia-

Steven Borelli
But I’m just saying… Believe it or not, Norm, the entire Geneva Convention is all on Wikipedia. It’s a wonderful website.

(02:44:31)
Mouin Rabbani
You know better. You know better-

Benny Morris
No, I don’t know better. You don’t know Israeli pilots, that’s the problem-

Norman Finkelstein
Thank God.

Benny Morris
No, you don’t know Israeli pilots-

Norman Finkelstein
I know, thank God.

(02:44:59)
Norman Finkelstein
No, they saw the sides, but let’s see the side-

Steven Bonnell
Oh, I know what he’s quoting, correct, but you’ve lied about this particular instance in the past. Those kids weren’t just on the beaches as often stated in articles. Those kids were literally coming out of a previously identified Hamas compound that they had operated from. They literally-

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Borelli-

Steven Bonnell
You could Google it, Mr. Finkel-stinker- ??? good one i guess if you're fucking five

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Borelli, with all due respect, you’re such a fantastic moron, it’s terrifying. That wharf was filled with journalists. There were scores of journalists. That was an old fisherman’s shack. What are you talking about? It’s so painful to listen to this idiocy-

Steven Bonnell
And to be clear, on the other side, you’re implying that the strike was okayed on the Israeli side where they said, “We’re just going to kill four Palestinian people today for no reason.”

Norman Finkelstein
Hey-

Benny Morris
Do you believe that?

Steven Bonnell
Do you believe that? Do you believe that? [inaudible 02:45:57] journalists, do you think that [inaudible 02:46:00]

Norman Finkelstein
Here we go-

Benny Morris
That they would actually kill four children?

Steven Bonnell
He went answer the question-

Norman Finkelstein
Here we go-

Steven Bonnell
He will never answer that question.

Norman Finkelstein
I will answer the question-

Benny Morris
The pilots were out to kill four children-

Norman Finkelstein
I will even answer the moron’s questions-

Steven Bonnell
Because that was a strike, that was a drone strike, so that was approved all the way up the chain that we’re going to kill children today. We’re going to kill Palestinian children today-

Norman Finkelstein
Okay, you want me to answer or do you want your motormouth to go?

(02:47:17)
Norman Finkelstein
Okay. So as you know, along the Gaza perimeter, there was Israel’s best-trained snipers. Correct?

Benny Morris
I don’t know best-trained. There was snipers-

Norman Finkelstein
Fine. Okay. All right. Because… Hey, laugh. It’s hilarious. This story’s so funny-

Steven Bonnell
You’re lying. The Great March of Return had aspects of violence to it. Even the UN says it themselves.

Norman Finkelstein
Okay, okay, okay.

Steven Bonnell
But you only collect what the UN says that you like.

Norman Finkelstein
You see the problem, Mr. Morelli, is, you don’t know the English language. You don’t-

Steven Bonnell
I can read from the UN website itself. In regards to the Great March of Return, they said, “While the vast majority of protestors have acted in a peaceful manner, during most protests dozens have approached the fence attempting to damage it, burning fires, throwing stones and Molotov cocktails towards Israeli forces, and flying incendiary kites and balloons into Israeli territory. The latter resulted in extensive damage to agricultural land and nature reserves inside Israel and risked the lives of Israeli civilians. Some incidents of shooting and throwing of explosives also reported-“

Norman Finkelstein
Talk Fast. Talk fast so people think that you’re coherent-

Steven Bonnell
I’m just reading from the UN-

Norman Finkelstein
Yeah, but you’re saying-

Steven Berelli
I know you like them sometimes, only when they agree with you though.

Norman Finkelstein
You got the months wrong. You got the months wrong. We’re talking about the beginning in March 30th to what-

Steven Farelli
You just described that march as mostly peaceful.

Norman Finkelstein
Okay, allow me to finish. So there were the snipers, okay. Now, you find it so far-fetched. Israelis purposely, deliberately targeting civilians? That’s such a far-fetched idea. An overwhelmingly nonviolent march. What did the international investigation-

Benny Morris
It wasn’t the march. It was a campaign which went on for months.

Norman Finkelstein
Whatever you want to call it, yeah. What did the UN investigation find? It found-

Benny Morris
Well, he just read it for you.

Norman Finkelstein
I read the report. I don’t read things off of those machines. I read the report. What did it find? Brace yourself. You thought it was so funny, the idea of IDF targeting civilians. It found… Go look this up on your machine-

Steven Bonnell
I already know what you’re going to say. You’re going to say it found that only one or two of them were justified killings-

Norman Finkelstein
It targeted children, targeted journalists, targeted medics. And here’s the funniest one of all, it’s so hilarious, they targeted disabled people who were 300 meters away from the fence and just standing by trees-

(02:50:37)
Steven Morelli
That’s fine, but then the second thing is, or there’s two distinctions I want to draw between. I think Benny would say this, I would say this. I’m sure, undoubtedly, there have been cases where IDF soldiers, for no good reason, have targeted and killed Palestinians that they should not have done, that would be prosecutable as war crimes as defined by the [inaudible 02:50:56]-

Benny Morris
And some have been prosecuted.

Steven Bonnell
And I’m absolutely sure-

Norman Finkelstein
According to you and your book, practically none.

Steven Botulism
I’m sure that we would all agree for soldiers that that happens, but I think that it’s important that when we talk about military strikes or we talk about things especially involving bombings or drone attacks, these are things that are signed off by multiple different layers of command, by multiple people involved in an operation, including intelligence gathering, including weaponeering, and they also have typically lawyers involved. When you make the claim that an IDF soldier shot a Palestinian, those three people, the three hostages that came up with white flags, that something horrible happened, I think that’s a fair statement to make and I think a lot of criticism is deserved, but when you make the statement that four children were killed by a strike, the claim that you’re making-

Norman Finkelstein
Deliberately, yeah.

Steven Bonnell
The claim that you’re making is that multiple levels of the IDF signed off-

Norman Finkelstein
I have no idea what [inaudible 02:51:47]-

Steven Bonnell
That’s great if you don’t understand the process, then let me educate you.

Norman Finkelstein
You don’t understand the process.

Steven Bonnell
I do understand the process, I’m telling you. I’m trying to explain to you right now.

Norman Finkelstein
Really? You’re in the IDF?

Steven Bonnell
No, it’s basic-

Norman Finkelstein
You’re studying the IDF.

Steven Bonnell
You can ask anybody that talks about-

Norman Finkelstein
Aside from Wikipedia, can you tell me what your knowledge of the IDF is?

Steven Bonnell
You can talk to people who work in the military-

Norman Finkelstein
What’s your knowledge of the IDF?

Steven Bonnell
Your audience can look this up. Do you think that bombing and strikes are decided by one person in the field? Do you think one person-

Mouin Rabbani
Can I respond to that?

Steven Bonnell
[inaudible 02:52:10] on a drone strike-

Benny Morris
[inaudible 02:52:11] a pilot doesn’t do it on his own.

Mouin Rabbani
Can I respond-

Steven Barelli
[inaudible 02:52:14] have entire apparatuses that are designed to figure out how to strike and who to strike, so when you say that four children are targeted, you’re saying that a whole apparatus that tries to murder-

Norman Finkelstein
You made my argument better than me-

Steven Bonnell
… Poor Palestinian children.

Norman Finkelstein
You made my argument better than me.

Steven Morelli
Which is a ridiculous argument.

Norman Finkelstein
Oh, really? It’s impossible at the command level, but you said that they couldn’t have done it at the bottom if it weren’t also at the top.

Steven Bonelli
You don’t understand the strength of the claim that you’re making. You’re saying that from a top down level, that lawyers, multiple commanders, intelligence, all these people signed off-

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Bonnell, do not tell me what I don’t understand.

Steven Bonnell
… On killing poor Palestinians, children.

Norman Finkelstein
It’s true, I don’t spend my nights on Wikipedia. I read books. I admit that as a-

Steven Bonnell
That’s a waste of time, by the way. You’re wasting time [inaudible 02:52:55].

Norman Finkelstein
I know, books are a waste of time. With all due regard, they’re-

Steven Bonnell
Well, according to you they are. The only thing you take from them are two or three quotes that you use to push people around.

Norman Finkelstein
I completely respect the fact… And I’ll say it on the air, as much as I find totally disgusting what’s come of your politics, a lot of the books are excellent, and I’ll even tell you because I’m not afraid of saying it, whenever I have to check on the basic fact, the equivalent of going to the Britannica, I go to your books. I know you got a lot of the facts right.

Lex Fridman
Benny Morris’ books for the listener.

Norman Finkelstein
I would never say books are a waste of time and it’s regrettable to you that you got strapped with a partner who thinks that all the wisdom-

(02:57:07)
Benny Morris
You are saying that they deliberately targeted families. If Israel wanted to kill civilians in Gaza, they could have killed 500,000 by now with the number of strikes they’ve done and the fact that they’ve only killed a certain small number [inaudible 02:57:22]-

Mouin Rabbani
30,000 is a small number?

Benny Morris
Small number in proportion-

Mouin Rabbani
You consider 30,000 a small number?

Benny Morris
Small number in proportion over four months probably is an indication that-

Norman Finkelstein
12,000 children is only.

Benny Morris
… Is targeted and that there are Hamas targets in these places.

Norman Finkelstein
12,000 children is only, and if that’s the case, why is it-

Benny Morris
Did I use the word only?

Norman Finkelstein
Yeah, you said only. Professor Morris, here’s a question for you, if we take every combat zone in the world for the past three years, every combat zone in the world-

Benny Morris
In Vietnam, the Americans killed 1 million people.

Mouin Rabbani
Well, the [inaudible 02:57:58] killed 40 million.

Norman Finkelstein
I was in the anti-war movement, so don’t strap me-

Benny Morris
The Americans killed 1 million people in Vietnam.

Norman Finkelstein
Fine, and 30 million Russians were killed during World War II, so everything else is irrelevant.

(02:58:15)
Norman Finkelstein
Professor Morris, here’s a question, it’s very perplexing. If you take every combat zone in the world for the past three years and you multiply the number of children killed by four, every combat zone in the world, you get Gaza. So when you say-

Steven Bonnell
What is that supposed to prove?

Norman Finkelstein
I’m going to tell you… Just shut up

Benny Morris
Firstly, you’re lying on Hamas numbers.

Norman Finkelstein
No, I’m not lying [inaudible 02:58:44]-

Benny Morris
Hamas numbers are not necessarily true.

Norman Finkelstein
… The numbers that everybody else… I’m lying in the numbers [inaudible 02:58:47]-

Steven Bonnell
Even if we take the numbers though, what does that prove?

Benny Morris
Those are Hamas numbers, which may not be true. They could invent anything because you know that they are a mendacious organization.

Norman Finkelstein
I know mendacious, believe me-

Benny Morris
You like the word mendacious?

Norman Finkelstein
Mendacious as in the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. So here’s the thing, you say they could have killed 500,000, but they only killed, only, that’s your words, they only killed 30,000.

Benny Morris
You believe that they deliberately target civilians, they would’ve killed many, many more. The fact is that they don’t deliberately target civilians.

Norman Finkelstein
Professor Morris, for [inaudible 02:59:24]-

Benny Morris
And you don’t understand Israeli society.

Norman Finkelstein
I don’t want to understand Israeli society.

Benny Morris
You don’t want the truth.

Norman Finkelstein
I don’t want to. I don’t want to get inside their heads.

Benny Morris
That’s the problem.

Steven Bonnell
[inaudible 02:59:33].

Norman Finkelstein
90%-

Benny Morris
A good historian tries to get into the heads of-

Norman Finkelstein
There’s a limit.

Benny Morris
… The various protagonists.

Norman Finkelstein
There’s a limit.

Benny Morris
A good historian does.

Norman Finkelstein
When 90% of Israelis think that Israel’s using enough or too little force in Gaza, I don’t want to get inside that head. 40% think that Israel is using insufficient force in Gaza. I don’t want to get inside that head. I don’t want to get inside the head of people who think they’re using insufficient force against the population, half of which is children. I don’t want to get inside that head, but here’s the point, because your partner wants to know the point. You don’t understand political constraints. One of your ministers said, “Let’s drop an atomic bomb on Gaza.”

Benny Morris
You think he really meant that?

Mouin Rabbani
He said it three times.

Benny Morris
No, no, no, it was said in a sort of a very questionable way. He didn’t say they should drop an atomic bomb.

Mouin Rabbani
He said it the day after the ICJ met.

Benny Morris
This minister is a messianic idiot, but he didn’t say drop an atomic bomb [inaudible 03:00:43].

Mouin Rabbani
He said it [inaudible 03:00:44].

Norman Finkelstein
None other Israel’s chief historian, the justifiably famed Benny Morris, thinks we should be dropping nuclear weapons on Iran.

Norman Finkelstein
None other Israel’s chief historian, the justifiably famed Benny Morris, thinks we should be dropping nuclear weapons on Iran.

Benny Morris
Iran, its leaders for years have said, “We should destroy Israel.” Do you agree with that? They’ve said, “We should destroy Israel. Israel must be destroyed.” Is that correct? This is what the Iranian leaders have been saying since Khomeini.

Norman Finkelstein
I would say Iranian leaders have sent mixed messages.

Benny Morris
But some of them have said, including Khamenei-

Norman Finkelstein
If you don’t know the evidence, why are you laughing?

Steven Bonnell
The slightest skepticism, it’s very funny.

Norman Finkelstein
It’s funny because-

Steven Bonnell
Iran that supports Hezbollah and the Houthis and Hamas, maybe they want Israel destroyed.

Norman Finkelstein
Brace yourself to the extent that the Houthis are trying to stop the genocide in Gaza, I support-

Steven Bonnell
[inaudible 03:01:37] ships. I know I selectively support international law when it agrees with you and then when it doesn’t, you decide to throw international law to the wind.

Benny Morris
There’s no genocide in Gaza.

Norman Finkelstein
If you like [inaudible 03:01:46]-

(03:07:25)
Mouin Rabbani
For some reason, you don’t have a problem with people being pro-Israeli at the time of this, but if they support Palestinians’ right to life or self-determination, they get demonized and de-legitimized as pro-Hamas?

Benny Morris
They supported an organization which murdered 1,200 people deliberately. That’s my problem.

Mouin Rabbani
But supporting a state that has murdered 30,000 [inaudible 03:\07:45]-

Benny Morris
But they haven’t because these are 30,000 are basically human shields to get by the Hamas, in which the Hamas wanted killed. They wanted them killed. Hamas wanted these people killed.

Mouin Rabbani
Sure, if I could just get-

Benny Morris
You don’t think they wanted them killed?

Mouin Rabbani
No, I don’t.

Benny Morris
They didn’t provide them with shelters. They build tunnels for their fighters, but not one shelter for their own civilians.

(03:08:49)
Mouin Rabbani
So, the reason I raised the South African application is twofold. Hamas or no Hamas, it’s exceptionally detailed on the question of intent. And secondly, when the International Court of Justice issues a ruling, individual justices have the right can give their own opinion. And I found the German one to be the most interesting on this specific question because he was basically saying that he didn’t think South Africa presented a persuasive case, but he said their section on intent was so overpowering that he felt he was left with no choice but to vote with the majority. So, I think that answers the intent part of your question.

Steven Morelli
So, for the ICJ case that South Africa has brought, I think there’s a couple of things that need to be mentioned. One is, and I saw you two talk at length about this, the plausibility standard is incredibly low. The only thing we’re looking for is a basic presentation of facts that make it conceivable, possible that-

Mouin Rabbani
Plausible.

Steven Bonnell
Plausible, which legally, this is obviously below criminal conviction, below-

Mouin Rabbani
Yes, of course. Think of it as an indictment.

Steven Barelli
Sure, possibly, maybe even a lower level than even an indictment, so plausibility is an incredibly low standard, number one. Number two, if you actually go through and you read the complaint that South Africa filed, I would say that if you go through the quotes and you even follow through to the source of the quotes, the misrepresentation that South Africa does in their case about all of these horrendous quotes, in my opinion, borders on criminal.

Mouin Rabbani
16 ICJ judges disagree.

Steven Bonnell
That’s fine if 16 ICJ judges disagree, but I’m going to give-

Norman Finkelstein
They must be awfully incompetent.

Steven Bonnell
They could be.

Norman Finkelstein
Even the American judge, she must have been awful incompetent if she was unable to see the misrepresentations that Mr. Bonnell based on his Wikipedia entry was able to find.

Steven Bonnell
So, this is based on the official ICJ report that was released. I’m not sure if you read the entire thing.

Norman Finkelstein
I read every aspect.

Steven Morelli
Did you go through and actually identify any of the sources of underlying quotes?

Norman Finkelstein
Actually, brace yourself for this and Mouin could confirm it, Yaniv Kogan, an Israeli, and Jamie Stern-Weiner, a half Israeli, they checked every single quote in the Hebrew original and Yaniv Kogan, love the guy, he has terrifying powers of concentration, he checked every single quote. Is that correct, Mouin?

Mouin Rabbani
Mm-hmm.

Norman Finkelstein
And Jamie checked every single quote in the English, in the context, and where there were any contextual questions they told us.

Mouin Rabbani
I think they found one.

Norman Finkelstein
Yeah, I think they found one. So, I do not believe that those 15 judges… It was 15 to two?

Mouin Rabbani
16 to two, I think.

Norman Finkelstein
There are 15 in the court plus two, so it’s 17, so it’s 15 to two. I don’t think those 15 judges were incompetent and I certainly don’t believe the president of the court, an American, would allow herself to be duped.

(03:16:00)
Norman Finkelstein
I read the report. To tell you the truth, I followed very closely everything that’s been happening to October 7th, I was mesmerized. I couldn’t believe the comprehensiveness of that particular report. Number two, there are two quite respected judges… Excuse me, there were two quite respected experts of international law sitting on the South African panel, John Dugard and Vaughan Lowe. Vaughan Lowe, as you might know, he argued the war case in 2004 before the International Court of Justice. Now, they were alleging genocide, which in their view means the evidence in their minds…

We are not yet at the court. The evidence in their minds compels the conclusion that genocide is being committed. I am willing, because I happen to know Mr. Dugard personally, and I have corresponded with Vaughan Lowe, I’ve heard their claim, I’ve read the report. I would say they make a very strong case, but let’s agree plausible. Now, here’s a question, if somebody qualifies for an Olympic team, let’s say a regional person qualifies for an Olympic team, it doesn’t mean they’re going to be on the Olympic team, it doesn’t mean they’re going to win a gold medal, a silver medal, or a bronze medal-

Benny Morris
But they can swim, that’s what you’re saying.

Norman Finkelstein
No, I would say that’s a very high bar-

Benny Morris
You’re saying they can swim.

Norman Finkelstein
… To even qualify.

Mouin Rabbani
They can swim well enough to have a realistic prospect at winning a medal.

Norman Finkelstein
So, the even make it to plausible-

Steven Bumblebee
That is not true. That is not what plausible means. It’s absolutely not. You’re dead wrong.

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Berelli, please don’t teach me about the English language.

Steven Bonnell
So, the declaration judge [inaudible 03:17:53]-

Norman Finkelstein
I said plausibility is the same concept as qualifying.

Steven Bonnell
The court is not asked at this present phase of the proceedings to determine whether South Africa’s allegations of genocide are well-founded. They’re not even well-founded. You said that plausible was a high standard, it’s absolutely not. It’s a misrepresentation of the strength of the case against Israel, just like the majority of the quotes they have in this case are. And also you said it was an extremely well-founded case. They spent like one-fourth of all the quotations, some even pulled from the Goldstone Report, that actually deal with the intent part, which is, by the way, I don’t know if you used the phrase dolus specialis, that the intentional part of genocide-

Mouin Rabbani
I don’t know that term.

Steven Bonnell
I think it’s called dolus specialis, it’s the most important part of genocide, which is proving it is a highly special intent to commit genocide. It’s possible that Israel could-

Norman Finkelstein
That’s [foreign language 03:18:43].

Steven Bonnell
Yes, I understand the state of mind, but for genocide, it’s called dolus specialis. It’s a highly special intent. Did you read the case?

Norman Finkelstein
Yeah.

Steven Borelli
It is a highly special intent [inaudible 03:18:56]-

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Berelli, I’m going to ask you again-

Steven Farelli
Yes.

Norman Finkelstein
… Please stop displaying your imbecility.

Steven Farelli
I’m sorry if you think the declaration of the judge is imbecility.

Norman Finkelstein
Don’t put on public display that you are a moron. At least have the self-possession to shut up. Did I read the case?

Steven Morelli
I’m comfortable putting my display on camera if you’re comfortable putting yours in books.

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Berelli, I read the case around four times. I read all of the majority opinion, the declarations, I read our own Barack’s declaration [inaudible 03:19:27]-

(03:21:41)
Benny Morris
Remember what I just said, they won’t rule there was genocide. Remember what I said.

Steven Bonnell
Also, I recommend people actually read the case and follow through a lot of the quotes that they just don’t show genocidal intent.

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Berelli, brace yourself.

(03:26:14)
Steven Bonnell
But even at that, we’re probably not going to agree. He’s going to say… You could write that. I can predict the whole line. He’s going to say from ’93 to ’99, he’s going to say, Israel didn’t adhere to the Oslo courts ever, settlement expansion continued, raids happened into the West Bank, that there was never a legitimate… That Netanyahu came in and violated the Y Memorandum, the transference. He’s going to say all of this and he’s not going to bring up anything of the Palestinian side. And then for Camp David, he’s going to say that yeah, that Arafat was trying, that the maps and the territorial exchange wasn’t good enough, that they were asking Palestinians to make all the concessions, that Israel would’ve made-

Lex Fridman
Well, lay it all out. Lay it out.

Benny Morris
You do talk quickly.

Steven Bonnell
Yeah, I know. Yeah.

(03:54:35)
Norman Finkelstein
According to the International Court of Justice, the designated unit for Palestinian self-determination, and they deny any right whatsoever on the right of return. I don’t want to go into the details now. The maximum formal offer was by Ehud Omar in 2008. He offered 5,000 refugees could return under what was called family reunification, 5,000, in the course of five years, and no recognition of any Israeli responsibility.

So if you use as the baseline what the UN General Assembly has said and what the International Court of Justice has said, if you use that baseline, international law, by that baseline, all the concessions came from the Palestinian side. Every single concession came from the Palestinian side. None came from the Israeli side. They may have accepted less than what they wanted, but it was still beyond what international law allocated to them. Now you say-

Mouin Rabbani
Allocated to the Palestinians.

Norman Finkelstein
Allocated to Palestinians, yes. Thank you for the clarification. Now about Arafat, like the Mufti, never liked the guy. I think that was one of the only disagreements Mouin and I had. When Arafat passed, you were a little sentimental. I was not. I never liked the guy. But politics, you don’t have to like the guy. There was no question. Nobody argues it that whenever the negotiation started up, the Palestinians just kept saying the same things.

Benny Morris
No.

Norman Finkelstein
No.

Benny Morris
They kept saying no.

Norman Finkelstein
No. Professor Morris, with due respect, incorrect. They kept saying, “International legitimacy, international law, UN resolutions.” They said, “We already gave you what the law required. We gave that in 1988, November 1988, and then ratified again at Oslo in 1993.” And they said, “Now we want what was promised us under international law.” And that was the one point where everybody on the other side agreed. Clinton, don’t talk to me about international law. Livni during the Olmert administration. She said, “I studied international law. I don’t believe in international law.” Every single member on the other side, they didn’t want to hear from international law. And to my thinking that that is the only reasonable baseline for trying to resolve the conflict. And Israel has, along with the US-

Benny Morris
When has international law been relevant to any conflict basically in the world?

Norman Finkelstein
That’s why-

Benny Morris
Over the last 150 years.

Norman Finkelstein
That’s why the Palestinians have to recognize Israel because that’s international law.

Benny Morris
But international law is-

Norman Finkelstein
[inaudible 03:58:00] have to recognize Israel because that’s international law.

Benny Morris
No, but international law is meaningless. oh my god, he admit it!

(04:05:13)
Norman Finkelstein
Professor Morris. Professor Morris.

Mouin Rabbani
Come on.

Benny Morris
That’s what Israelis want.

Norman Finkelstein
Professor Morris.

Benny Morris
They want a change of psyche among the Palestinians.

Norman Finkelstein
Mouin has an interesting-

Benny Morris
If that doesn’t happen, there won’t be a Palestinian state. There just won’t be.

Norman Finkelstein
Mouin has an interesting point.

Benny Morris
Forget international law and all the UN resolutions.

Norman Finkelstein
I know you want to forget it just like you want to forget the genocide charge. I know you want to forget that.

(04:16:33)
Steven Bonnell
The problem is, as Benny said, yeah, it’s difficult because Hamas enjoys so much widespread support amongst the Palestinian people. I think that… Well, I don’t know. There’s opinions on whether democracy or pushing them towards elections was the right or wrong idea. But with an Islamic fundamentalist government for Hamas, I don’t know if a negotiation with Israel ever happens there.

And then when the international pressure is always ’67 borders, infinite right of return for refugees, and a total withdrawal of Israel from all these lands to even start negotiations, I just don’t see, realistically, on the Palestinian side, no negotiations are ever going to start in a place that Israel’s willing to accept.

Mouin Rabbani
If you want to dismiss international law, that’s fine, but then you have to do it consistently. You can’t set standards for the Palestinians but reject applying those standards to Israel. If we’re going to have the law of the jungle, then we can all be beasts and not only some of us. So it’s either that or you have certain agreed standards that are intended to regulate our conduct, all of our conduct, not just some of us. So that’s a fundamental-

Steven Bonnell
[inaudible 04:17:46] I’m saying to abandon?

Mouin Rabbani
Well, you’re saying international law and the millionth UN resolution, you’re being very dismissive about all these things.

Steven Morelli
Well, I’m saying [inaudible 04:17:54]-

Mouin Rabbani
And that’s fine.

Steven Bonnell
I’m not being dismissive.

Mouin Rabbani
But then you have to be dismissive across the board.

Steven Bonnell
I’m just saying, for instance, 242, that was a Chapter VI resolution. That’s non-binding. But 242 [inaudible 04:18:01]-

Mouin Rabbani
It’s binding.

Steven Bonnell
It’s absolutely not binding.

Mouin Rabbani
It’s binding.

Norman Finkelstein
What is binding? Do you know anything about how the UN system works?

Steven Bonnell
If you read the language of the resolution, binding is typically if it commits you to upholding a particular international law or if it establishes [inaudible 04:18:13].

Norman Finkelstein
What is Chapter VI? You just throw out words. You hear binding, not binding.

(04:18:31)
Mouin Rabbani
Yeah, but hold on. Hold on. Every United Nations Security Council resolution, irrespective of under which chapter it was adopted, is, by definition, binding. Binding not only on the members of the Security Council but on every member state of the UN. Read the UN Charter. It’s black and white.

Steven Bonnell
Sure. People can look that up [inaudible 04:18:53]-

Mouin Rabbani
Yes.

Steven Bonnell
… but the language even of 242 is kept intentionally vague such that it doesn’t actually provide, again, the final [inaudible 04:18:59]-

Mouin Rabbani
It’s actually not that vague-

Steven Bonnell
It’s incredibly vague.

Mouin Rabbani
… because the term “land for peace” originates in 242. The idea is-

Steven Bonnell
Sure, but the part about territorial acquisition and Israel’s need to give it up was kept vague. That’s why, in ’79, Israel thought that they fulfilled their obligations under 242 [inaudible 04:19:13]-

Mouin Rabbani
You asked a separate question.

Norman Finkelstein
Allow me points of information. The first principle in UN Resolution 242 is that the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force-

Steven Bonnell
Which is meaningless.

Norman Finkelstein
It may be meaningless to you, Mr. Bonnell.

Steven Bonnell
It was meaningless to everyone in the region.

Norman Finkelstein
Okay. Mr. Bonnell, that principle was adopted by the Friendly Nations Resolution, the UN General Assembly in 1970. That resolution was then reiterated in the International Court of Justice ruling, advisory opinion in 2004. That was the basis of the coalition against Iraq when it acquired Kuwait and then declared it a province of Kuwait.

(04:20:17)
Norman Finkelstein
It’s called, under international law, jus cogens or peremptory norms of international law, the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war. That is not controversial. It’s not vague. You couldn’t put it more succinctly. You cannot acquire territory by force under international law.

Steven Weaselly
On the West Bank before ’67, who owned the Gaza Strip before ’67?

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Bonnell, don’t change the subject. If you don’t know what you’re talking about-

Steven Bonnell
It’s not about [inaudible 04:20:50]-

Norman Finkelstein
… at least have the humility-

Steven Borrell
How close has 242-

Norman Finkelstein
You talk about Chapter VI-

Steven Bonnell
How close has 242 gotten-

Norman Finkelstein
You don’t know Chapter VI-

Steven Bonnell
How close has 242 gotten the Palestinians to peace?

Norman Finkelstein
You don’t know Chapter VI from tweet five. You have no idea what you’re talking about. It’s just so embarrassing. At least have some humility. Between us who have read maybe 10,000 books on the topic and you’ve read two Wikipedia entries and you start talking about Chapter VI. Do you know what Chapter VII is?

Steven Bonnell
Answer me. Answer the question.

Norman Finkelstein
Do you know what Chapter VII is?

Steven Beelzebub
Norm, answer the question. How close has 242 gotten the Palestinians to a state?

Mouin Rabbani
Let me ask you this.

Steven Bonnell
How close has the 2004 advisory opinion gotten the West Bank settlement [inaudible 04:21:26]?

Mouin Rabbani
What’s your alternative?

Steven Bonnell
The alternative is not this, whatever this making money off the conflict is. The actual alternative-

Norman Finkelstein
[inaudible 04:21:33] making money-

Steven Wikipedia
The actual alternative-

Norman Finkelstein
Destiny should talk about making money off of idiocy.

Steven Borelli
Yes. Yeah, you’re a media [inaudible 04:21:37] when you go and talk to 50 million different people about your awesome [inaudible 04:21:40].

Benny Morris
But he has a point, though.

Norman Finkelstein
What point?

Steven Morelli
But the issue is you have to negotiate-

Benny Morris
All these resolutions have gotten the Palestinians no closer to a state.

Steven Farelli
Nothing.

Norman Finkelstein
Yeah, but hold on. Because they haven’t been enforced because of the US veto.

Benny Morris
They’re not going to be enforced.

Norman Finkelstein
Wait, wait, wait, wait.

Benny Morris
They’ve gotten nowhere-

Mouin Rabbani
If I may, if I may-

Steven Borelli
[inaudible 04:21:52].

Norman Finkelstein
You know what? You know what? Professor Morris-

Steven Bonnell
[inaudible 04:21:58] about the case for genocide.

Norman Finkelstein
Professor Morris, because of your logic, and I’m not disputing it, that’s why October 7th happened.

Benny Morris
Oh my God.

Norman Finkelstein
Because there was no options left for those people. Exactly what Mouin said.

Benny Morris
And now what options are left? After October 7th-

Steven Bonnell
This has been the Palestinian mentality for 60 years.

Benny Morris
… what’s the options left?

Steven Berelli
The only option is conflict.

Norman Finkelstein
Listen to this.

Steven Bonnell
The only option is combat.

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Bonnell is now an expert on Palestinian mentality.

Mouin Rabbani
Hold on. You’re contradicting yourself.

Norman Finkelstein
You know as much about Palestinian politics as you know about Chapter V.

Steven Borelli
I only deal with facts. I only deal with facts. Egypt didn’t find it necessary to-

Norman Finkelstein
Tell me about Chapter V.

Steven Bonnell
Egypt didn’t find it necessary-

Norman Finkelstein
Tell me about Chapter V.

Steven Bonnell
… to negotiate peace [inaudible 04:22:34] the Palestinians. Jordan didn’t find it necessary to negotiate peace [inaudible 04:22:36] the Palestinians.

Mouin Rabbani
Hey, if I may-

Steven Barelli
The Abraham Accords [inaudible 04:22:37] the Palestinians-

Norman Finkelstein
Talk faster, faster, faster, faster.

Steven Bonnell
… despite all of the international law-

Lex Fridman
Everybody, Mouin.

Norman Finkelstein
Faster.

(04:23:28)
Steven Bonnell
You can quote Arafat talking about how he’s lying and he’s just going to use… In ’94 and ’95 when he’s making trips around the world, how he just wanted [inaudible 04:23:35] starting ground.

Norman Finkelstein
Talk faster. Talk faster.

Steven Borelli
I’m sorry. I can’t talk slow. You can watch [inaudible 04:23:38] and slow it down to 0.5 speed if you don’t understand what I’m saying.

Norman Finkelstein
Faster. Faster.

Mouin Rabbani
There’s a very lengthy history-

Norman Finkelstein
Motor mouth.

Mouin Rabbani
… of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. You want to deny that those negotiations took place.

Steven Bonnell
Where it feels like there was a good-faith effort-

Norman Finkelstein
What it feels like.

Steven Farelli
Where there was a good-faith effort-

Norman Finkelstein
Feels like.

Steven Bonnell
Where there was a good-faith effort-

Norman Finkelstein
We have a written record.

Steven Bonnell
With all due respect-

Norman Finkelstein
We have a written record, Mr. Bonnell.

Steven Bonnell
Mr. Pop History, you can’t even read the written records. I don’t know why you’re referring to them. Okay.

Norman Finkelstein
Excuse me? I just said there are 15,000 pages on Annapolis.

Steven Morelli
And I’m sure you cherry-picked your favorite quotes from all of them. Okay.

Norman Finkelstein
I don’t cherry-pick.

Steven Farelli
That’s great. That’s great.

Norman Finkelstein
Mr. Bonnell, at least I had a quote to cherry-pick.

Steven Bonnell
That’s great. [inaudible 04:24:12].

Norman Finkelstein
All you have is Wikipedia.

Steven Bonnell
I gave you quotes.

Norman Finkelstein
All you have is Wikipedia.

CONTINUED IN COMMENT BELOW

    • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
      9·
      8 months ago

      at one point Norm tells him something to the effect of “Mr Bonerelli, between the 3 of us, we’ve read 10000 books and you’ve read two pages on wiki pedia” (he says it like two separate words - the man apparently refuses to use a computer). I did not expect him to nail debatejak to the post this fucking hard and fast.

      chefs-kiss

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
        2·
        4 months ago

        I saw some dorks on reddit being like “Bah such gatekeeping” about this comment. Which, like, do people really think that “debate about high level geo-political conflict” is not a gate which should be kept?

        • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
          3·
          4 months ago

          it’s the old saying “remain silent and be thought a fool or speak and forever remove all doubt.” self-awareness is a skill and calling someone out for lacking it isn’t gatekeeping to begin with. like if the topic were related to Bonercelli’s lived experience, this would be gatekeeping - but it’s not. he’s pontificating about a genocide thousands of miles away from where he lives.

  • Lerios [hy/hym]@hexbear.netEnglish
    54·
    8 months ago

    Steven Bonnell: No, no, I’m just saying that there were two tricks-

    Norman Finkelstein: You said nothing, as you always do.

    Benny Morris: No, you don’t know Israeli pilots-

    Norman Finkelstein: I know, thank God.

    FUCKING GET EM NORM agony-yehaw the complete open lack of respect he has for destiny especially is phenomenal. he really has gone full joker huh

  • RedQuestionAsker2 [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
    48·
    8 months ago

    The beginning of the debate was super weird.

    I was surprised by the historical framing that happens. The Israeli side just takes as a given that the Zionists were owed a piece of Palestinian land and that the Palestinians should have accepted it. The focus is then over how either side of the conflict didn’t respect the original proposition or couldn’t be reasoned with.

    But like… They totally ignore the fact that Palestinians would OBVIOUSLY not be obligated to carve up their land and hand it to global imperialists. This pretty foundational and clear argument isn’t mentioned until like 3 hours into the debate.

    It reminds me of how skewed the framing is. Like when Norm’s partner says, “I’ve never, in my decades of experience, seen an interviewer ask ‘do you condemn Israel’s actions?’”

      • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
        23·
        8 months ago
        I scripted it. The menial part was getting the excerpts and coding it. Here's the python code. 
        import os
import re
import random


def debate(file_path):
    finkelsteinisms = {
        "Borelli",
        "Barelli",
        "Morelli",
        "Berelli",
        "Borrell",
        "Farelli",
    }

    absurdisms = {
        "Versace",
        "Bumblebee",
        "Bartholomew",
        "Penalty",
        "Bigamy",
        "Beetlejuice",
        "Basketball",
        "Beelzebub",
        "Botulism",
        "Botany",
        "Fealty",
        "Weaselly",
        "Bitchass",
        "Bonelli",
        "Wikipedia",
        "Zestily"
    }

    def process_content(content):
        sections = content.strip().split("\n\n")
        processed_sections = []

        for section in sections:
            lines = section.strip().split("\n")
            processed_lines = []
            first_timecode_found = False

            for line in lines:
                match = re.match(
                    r"(\w+ \w+)? ?\((\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2})\)\s*(.*)", line.strip()
                )
                if match:
                    speaker, timecode, message = match.groups()
                    if speaker:
                        if "Bonnell" in speaker and random.randint(1, 4) == 1:
                            if random.randint(1, 4) == 1:
                                mister_x = random.choice(list(absurdisms))
                            else:    
                                mister_x = random.choice(list(finkelsteinisms))
                            speaker = speaker.replace("Bonnell", mister_x)
                        if not first_timecode_found:
                            processed_line = f"`({timecode})`  \n**{speaker}**  \n{message.strip()}\n"
                            first_timecode_found = True
                        else:
                            processed_line = f"**{speaker}**  \n{message.strip()}\n"
                    else:
                        processed_line = f"\n{message.strip()}\n"
                    processed_lines.append(processed_line)
                else:
                    processed_lines.append(line)

            processed_section = "\n".join(processed_lines)
            processed_sections.append(processed_section)

        return "\n_______________\n\n".join(processed_sections)

    dir_name, base_name = os.path.split(file_path)
    name_part = os.path.splitext(base_name)[0]
    new_file = os.path.join(dir_name, f"{name_part}_updated.md")

    with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file:
        content = file.read()

    formatted_content = process_content(content)

    with open(new_file, "w", encoding="utf-8") as file:
        file.write(formatted_content)

        Here’s what it looked like preprocess pretty much:

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    40·
    8 months ago

    Patelli: The UN says “the vast majority” of protestors were peaceful

    Piranelli, seconds later: According to the UN, the protestors were not mostly peaceful

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      28·
      8 months ago
      ¯\(ツ)/¯ 
      import os
import re
import random


def debate(file_path):
    finkelsteinisms = {
        "Borelli",
        "Barelli",
        "Morelli",
        "Berelli",
        "Borrell",
        "Farelli",
    }

    absurdisms = {
        "Versace",
        "Bumblebee",
        "Bartholomew",
        "Penalty",
        "Bigamy",
        "Beetlejuice",
        "Basketball",
        "Beelzebub",
        "Botulism",
        "Botany",
        "Fealty",
        "Weaselly",
        "Bitchass",
        "Bonelli",
        "Wikipedia",
        "Zestily"
    }

    def process_content(content):
        sections = content.strip().split("\n\n")
        processed_sections = []

        for section in sections:
            lines = section.strip().split("\n")
            processed_lines = []
            first_timecode_found = False

            for line in lines:
                match = re.match(
                    r"(\w+ \w+)? ?\((\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2})\)\s*(.*)", line.strip()
                )
                if match:
                    speaker, timecode, message = match.groups()
                    if speaker:
                        if "Bonnell" in speaker and random.randint(1, 4) == 1:
                            if random.randint(1, 4) == 1:
                                mister_x = random.choice(list(absurdisms))
                            else:    
                                mister_x = random.choice(list(finkelsteinisms))
                            speaker = speaker.replace("Bonnell", mister_x)
                        if not first_timecode_found:
                            processed_line = f"`({timecode})`  \n**{speaker}**  \n{message.strip()}\n"
                            first_timecode_found = True
                        else:
                            processed_line = f"**{speaker}**  \n{message.strip()}\n"
                    else:
                        processed_line = f"\n{message.strip()}\n"
                    processed_lines.append(processed_line)
                else:
                    processed_lines.append(line)

            processed_section = "\n".join(processed_lines)
            processed_sections.append(processed_section)

        return "\n_______________\n\n".join(processed_sections)

    dir_name, base_name = os.path.split(file_path)
    name_part = os.path.splitext(base_name)[0]
    new_file = os.path.join(dir_name, f"{name_part}_updated.md")

    with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file:
        content = file.read()

    formatted_content = process_content(content)

    with open(new_file, "w", encoding="utf-8") as file:
        file.write(formatted_content)
  • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    37·
    8 months ago

    Norman Finkelstein Mr. Berelli, I’m going to ask you again-

    Steven Farelli Yes.

    Norman Finkelstein … Please stop displaying your imbecility.

    Steven Farelli I’m sorry if you think the declaration of the judge is imbecility.

    Norman Finkelstein Don’t put on public display that you are a moron. At least have the self-possession to shut up.

    data-laughing

  • Lerios [hy/hym]@hexbear.netEnglish
    35·
    8 months ago

    comrade i’m sorry you had to be exposed to this fucking cognitohazard but also thank you for exposing yourself to it so i don’t have to watch/read the whole thing rat-salute

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      29·
      8 months ago

      I have a high school friend who’s into Destiny and his political opinions are the most annoying “I’m going to take the side of whatever the status quo is so I don’t have to feel the stress of arguing for anything without a base of power behind it”-shit most of the time so I’m supernaturally compulsed to dunk on him when his debate daddy wanders into territory I can actually critique coherently. Basically I rationalized my reading of it as a public service, thanks anyways rat-salute-2

      • panopticon [comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
        11·
        8 months ago

        “I’m going to take the side of whatever the status quo is so I don’t have to feel the stress of arguing for anything without a base of power behind it”

        I love this, so succinct

    • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
      16·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, there is no way I could ever watch this. They should probably set rules on who is allowed to talk over who, at the very least.

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      28·
      8 months ago

      Copied from Lex Fridman’s transcription (linked in post). I just was thinking if people didn’t want to read the whole thing I’d give them what they came for.

  • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
    22·
    8 months ago
    transcript cont. 1

    (04:26:40)
    Norman Finkelstein
    The only place I saw pieces of Israel were the land swaps, and the land swaps accounted for about 2-5% of Israel. Nobody asked for all of Israel. Why do you say things like that?

    Steven Bonnell
    What do you mean? They asked for all of Israel in ’48. They asked for all of Israel in ’67. What do you think those reports were about?

    Norman Finkelstein
    Okay. Mr. Bonnell, you talk so-

    Steven Bonnell
    You’re not going to respond to anything I’m saying because you have no answer.

    Norman Finkelstein
    I’ll respond to you. Okay. Mr. Bonnell, we were talking about the diplomatic negotiations beginning with 2001.

    Steven Bigamy
    Yes, I understand, but you can’t pretend that the first ask for Israel was in diplomacy. It was through war.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Okay. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

    (04:35:38)
    Benny Morris
    Why is it illegal? They were shooting rockets at Israel for 20 years. Why is that illegal to blockade Gaza?

    Steven Farelli
    He thinks they’re bottle rockets, that’s what he calls them [inaudible 04:35:47].

    Norman Finkelstein
    Why is it illegal? I’ll tell you why.

    Benny Morris
    You don’t rocket your neighbor. You rocket your neighbor, expect consequences.

    Norman Finkelstein
    I’ll tell you why.

    Benny Morris
    Expect consequences.

    Mouin Rabbani
    But that works both ways.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Yes.

    Benny Morris
    I know, and I accept that, it works both ways.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Professor Morris. I’ll tell you why. Because every human rights, humanitarian and UN organization in the world-

    Benny Morris
    They’re all irrelevant.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … has said that the blockade-

    Benny Morris
    You keep quoting them. Nobody cares about Amnesty.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … is a form of collective punishment-

    Benny Morris
    Nobody cares about Amnesty.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … which is illegal under international law.

    Benny Morris
    Forget illegal. The word illegal is…

    Norman Finkelstein
    You think a blockade which-

    Benny Morris
    You don’t understand the way the world works. These things are irrelevant.

    Norman Finkelstein
    And you think confining, because that’s the blockade-

    Benny Morris
    Yes, you don’t shoot rockets at your neighbor.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … confining a million children-

    Benny Morris
    That’s the choice of Hamas.

    Steven Bonnell
    Children?

    Benny Morris
    That’s Hamas’ choice.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Confining a million children in what The Economist calls a human rubbish heap-

    Benny Morris
    The Economist supported Israel in this war, and continues to support Israel.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Okay. What International Committee of The Red Cross called a sinking ship, what the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called a toxic slum, you think-

    Benny Morris
    It is a slum, of course it’s a slum, but it’s caused by the Hamas.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … under international law, you think it’s legitimate-

    Benny Morris
    Forget the law.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Hey, I know you want to forget the law.

    Benny Morris
    What about morality? Forget the law, what about morality?

    Norman Finkelstein
    It’s what every Israeli fears the most.

    Benny Morris
    What?

    Norman Finkelstein
    The law.

    Benny Morris
    No, no, no.

    Norman Finkelstein
    As Tzipi Livni said, “I studied international law. I oppose international law.” Of course you don’t want to hear about the law.

    Benny Morris
    That has got nothing to do with anything.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Okay, so here’s the thing. Then don’t complain about October 7th.

    Benny Morris
    Do you hear me complaining? I didn’t complain.

    Norman Finkelstein
    If you want to say forget about the law-

    Benny Morris
    All I said was they acted like barbarians.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … when there is no international humanitarian law, there’s no distinction between civilians and combatants-

    Benny Morris
    There should be, but it’s got nothing to do with the law.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Now you’re doing what Mouin said, you’re becoming very selective about the law. If you want to forget about the law-

    Benny Morris
    People should be [inaudible 04:37:51].

    Mouin Rabbani
    Across the board.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … Hamas had every right to do what it did. It had every right to do what it did according to you, not to me, because you want to forget the law.

    Steven Bonnell
    Do you still support the Houthis shooting random ships?

    Norman Finkelstein
    Absolutely.

    Steven Bonnell
    Okay, that’s a violation of international law, so you play the same game.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Absolutely. And were there are power during World War II who had the courage of the Houthis, were there are power that had that kind of courage-

    Steven Bonnell
    So courageous to be bombing merchant ships while tens of thousands of people die of actual starvation, not the starvation that exists in the Gaza Strip where people before October 7th don’t die of starvation. Not the concentration camp, as they say of the Gaza Strip. The Houthis.

    Benny Morris
    What about starvation in Yemen? Don’t that have something better to do?

    Norman Finkelstein
    That was the Houthis.

    Benny Morris
    Yes, I know. Don’t they have anything better to do?

    Norman Finkelstein
    That was the Houthis, and you know in three years they blew up 180,000 people.

    Benny Morris
    Shouldn’t they be feeding the Yemenis?

    Norman Finkelstein
    You know, 60,000 Yemenis died in starvation?

    Benny Morris
    Why fight the western powers in Israel when you should be taking care of your problems at home, the Houthis.

    Mouin Rabbani
    Often the only allies of the dispossessed are those who experience similar circumstances.

    Benny Morris
    Don’t you think that they should take care of the Yemeni problems?

    Mouin Rabbani
    As I said-

    Norman Finkelstein
    I’m very happy they’re helping out the Palestinians.

    Benny Morris
    It’s at the expense of the Yemenis. They’ll pay for it.

    Norman Finkelstein
    Anybody who comes to the aid of those suffering the genocide-

    Benny Morris
    There’s no genocide.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … half of whom are children… Yeah, according to the most current UN reports, as of today-

    Benny Morris
    There’s no genocide.

    Norman Finkelstein
    … one quarter of the population of Gaza-

    Benny Morris
    Is starving.

    Norman Finkelstein
    That means 500,000 children-

    Benny Morris
    Are starving,

    Norman Finkelstein
    … are on the verge of famine.

    Benny Morris
    They keep saying on the verge of.

    Steven Bonnell
    On the verge of. Didn’t you quote that they said it was unlivable?

    Benny Morris
    I have not seen one Palestinian die of starvation in these last four months. Not one.

    Mouin Rabbani
    There have been documented cases.

    Benny Morris
    They are always on the verge. They’re on the verge.

    Mouin Rabbani
    There have been documented cases.

    Benny Morris
    I haven’t seen any.

    Steven Bonnell
    Yesterday Al Jazeera said six, and the day before that they said two, so those are the two.

    Benny Morris
    That number probably dies in Israel of starvation also.

    Mouin Rabbani
    I don’t think there’s famine in Israel.

    Norman Finkelstein
    You’re so laid back, so blasé.

    Benny Morris
    There isn’t. There isn’t in the Gaza Strip either. It’s something which is produced for the Western-

    Norman Finkelstein
    “I haven’t seen any starving children yet.”

      • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
        26·
        8 months ago

        yeah Destiny has the excuse of arrogant ignorance typical of an amerikkkan, though in the 99th percentile of such chauvinistic bullshit. Benny Morris is an accredited historian whose own work contradicts his worldview, an unrepentant Zionist ghoul who is aware and complicit.

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
          25·
          8 months ago

          Dude just totally spouts off nazi party line speech like it’s cool and normal. He has looked the gruesome facts in the eye and decided to defend them. That is pure evil, I was going to say ‘pure, cold, black hearted evil’ for emphasis but backspace, cause that’s wrong. Cold, blackhearted evil is too fucking good. He is full on emotionally invested, bleeding heart evil. That’s what we’re facing. People who are so passionate about evil a nitwit could mistake it for the passion that generally drives people to do good. This not only underlies the danger of such an evil that it poses so easily as righteous fervor, but to possess it in oneself is to truly have taken the demon seed within your very soul and nature that lacking any metaphysical woo shit, is the closest one can be to becoming a literal demon. This is the worst kind of person.

          • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
            18·
            8 months ago

            the qualitative chasm between people on the side of the population having war crimes done to them saying ‘international law is meaningless’ and the people on the side of the war criminals saying ‘international law is meaningless’ is fucking oceanic. Like, is this your fucking own? Is this your bit? ‘you cannot do shit to us, fuck all of you, we’ll keep killing, we have nukes’ is real fucking convincing. A publicly untenable position. You do not come out of a debate where you put that in the record a winner, any wins you have copped from that become pyrrhic and turn all your weaselly rhetorical dancing into ash. A genuinely psychotic ideology where you think that’s acceptable to say in a medium where you are trying to convince people.

            • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
              14·
              8 months ago

              Which, in all honesty, is how the world works, international law means Jack fucking shit based on just whsts currently happening not to even speak of history coughs Iraq really clearly. And yeah, any oppressor is for sure going to attempt to apply that double standard, comes with the territory of doing atrocities, that’s all pretty standard and being mad at hypocrisy is gonna get you no where. But holy fucking hell, have the decency to be cynical about it.

              I think it was in the newer Brace interview episode of True Annon where Israel is reaaaally letting the mask slip internationally as more and more of their internal propaganda/True national sentiment has really managed to get through and the rhetoric that is used within Israel has been shown outside of the country and it’s this disgusting combo of pathetic use of what democratic voters like to hear and see authentically combined with full on ethnic cleansing talk with no filter. You can only play the victim while openly and passionately endorsing an extermination campaign before it unravels. Lucky for them public opinion also means nothing sontheyre probably feeling comfortable as hell doing this.

          • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
            4·
            8 months ago

            Dude just totally spouts off nazi party line speech like it’s cool and normal.

            literally. Hasan dug up a quote from Goebbels that matched nearly word for word, at one point. it was shocking coming from a historian who knows exactly what he’s doing because, as was shown extensively in the debate by Norm, his own work lambasts his present position.

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      20·
      8 months ago
      transcript cont. 2

      (04:40:08)
      Norman Finkelstein
      I think Human Rights Watch called it using starvation as a weapon. That’s called engineering.

      Steven Bonnell
      That’s what they did, but you were pushed on this by Coleman Hughes to bring up an example of why is the Gaza Strip, by what metric are they starving? By what metric is it so behind the rest of the world?

      Mouin Rabbani
      If we’re going to bring up-

      Steven Bonnell
      I want to hear an answer to that, because he didn’t answer it before.

      Norman Finkelstein
      I’m happy to answer it. I just quoted you from the humanitarian organizations. They said one quarter of the population of Gaza is now verging on famine.

      Steven Bonnell
      Before October 7th.

      Norman Finkelstein
      I’m not going before October 7th.

      Steven Bonnell
      But you used that as justification for Hamas fighting. You said the conditions were unlivable, they had to fight.

      Norman Finkelstein
      I said to him-

      Steven Bonnell
      So my question is what made it unlivable prior to October 7th? What are the metrics that you’re using?

      Norman Finkelstein
      There were about five, six or seven reports issued by UNCTAD, issued by the World Bank, issued by the International Monetary Fund, and they all said that’s why.

      Steven Beetlejuice
      Why? Why did they say that?

      Norman Finkelstein
      That’s why The Economist, not a radical periodical, described Gaza as a human rubbish heap.

      Steven Bonnell
      So tell me by what metrics? If you’re a historian, if you do all this work to get to things, tell me what they said. Don’t just tell me a sentence, tell me by what metric.

      Norman Finkelstein
      Mr. Bonnell.

      Steven Penalty
      He’s not going to answer again.

      Norman Finkelstein
      I don’t think I’ve avoided any of your questions-

      Steven Farelli
      Of course you have, you’ve avoided every question.

      Norman Finkelstein
      … except when they breached the threshold of complete imbecility.

      Steven Bonnell
      So you were about to tell me by what metric the Gaza Strip is a humanitarian crisis.

      Norman Finkelstein
      I’m going to answer you. You remember what I said a moment ago, I said to Professor Morris, I defer to expertise? I look at what the organizations say. I look at what the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said.

      Steven Borelli
      You’re saying in more words that you don’t know. You don’t know or you don’t care.

      Norman Finkelstein
      And I don’t know.

      Steven Farelli
      Okay, that’s fine. That’s what I said.

      Norman Finkelstein
      Have you ever investigated how complicated is the metric for hunger, starvation, and famine? It is such a complicated metric they figured out, if you asked me to repeat it now, I couldn’t do it.

      Steven Morelli
      And yet we have a Human Development Index where we rank countries, yet we can still measure infant mortality-

      Norman Finkelstein
      Okay, you go and call the news programs.

      (04:47:09)
      Mouin Rabbani
      Well, I would expect nothing less from someone who doesn’t think Jim Crow is apartheid, but who does think that Arab states not giving Palestinians-

      Steven Bonnell
      The problem is you’re morally loading. For you apartheid is when racists do bad things.

      Mouin Rabbani
      No. There’s a definition of apartheid.

      Steven Bonnell
      That’s great.

      Mouin Rabbani
      There is a very clear definition of apartheid.

      Steven Bonnell
      A specific top-down racial domination, enacted through top-down, like federal legislative policies or whatever, means that I don’t know if Jim Crow would have qualified for apartheid. That doesn’t make it any less…

      Norman Finkelstein
      Have you ever heard of Plessy versus Ferguson?

      Steven Bonnell
      Excuse me. Finkelstein, I’m talking right now. Excuse me, excuse me Twinklestein, I’m talking to your friend over here. I don’t know if it would have qualified as the crime of apartheid, just like if Israel were to literally nuke the Gaza Strip and kill two million people, I don’t know if that would qualify for the crime of genocide.

      Mouin Rabbani
      In your eyes probably not.

      Steven Bonnell
      Well, yeah, but because genocide requires a special intent. I think the issue is, instead of… And I think this conversation actually is emblematic of the entire conversation.

      Mouin Rabbani
      Then let me finish answering Benny Morris’s question.

      Steven Bonnell
      Well sure, but you accused me of supporting racism.

      Mouin Rabbani
      Well, you did.

      Steven Bonnell
      I didn’t.

      Mouin Rabbani
      And you are.

      Steven Bonnell
      Do you think I support Jim Crow laws?

      Mouin Rabbani
      Look, when-

      Steven Bonnell
      The fact that you can’t even answer that honestly, right?

      Mouin Rabbani
      It doesn’t matter what-

      Steven Bonnell
      You couldn’t say that 800 civilians were killed by Hamas, you said, “Well, maybe 400 were killed by Israel. I don’t know the number, maybe-

      Mouin Rabbani
      No, I didn’t say that.

      Steven Bonnell
      You said 400.

      Mouin Rabbani
      No, I didn’t say that.

      Steven Bonnell
      You co-signed the opinion.

      Mouin Rabbani
      No, I didn’t.

      Norman Finkelstein
      No, he didn’t. He said the majority [inaudible 04:48:20].

      Steven Bonnell
      Well, wait, how many? I think the word was some, that’s what I heard.

      Norman Finkelstein
      No, I think your memory-

      Mouin Rabbani
      Well, you weren’t listening.

      Norman Finkelstein
      … your memory’s [R-SLUR]. D:

      Steven Farelli
      How many people do you think approximately, if you had to ballpark it, how many do you think were killed by Hamas on October 7th?

      Mouin Rabbani
      I think it’s pretty clear that the majority of civilians that were killed on-

      Norman Finkelstein
      That’s what he said.

      Steven Bonnell
      51%? Or 90%?

      Mouin Rabbani
      Don’t ask me to put a number on something I don’t know.

      Steven Bonnell
      I just want a ballpark. Those are two very different intuition.

      Mouin Rabbani
      First of all, when you say Hamas, do you mean Palestinians, or do you mean Hamas specifically?

      Steven Bonnell
      I mean the invading Palestinian force? I don’t like to say Palestinians, because I don’t think all Palestinian civilians were involved, so I’ll say Hamas, Islamic Jihad, whatever, Al Quds, whatever other-

      Mouin Rabbani
      But that’s how this discussion started. You said Hamas and I began to answer that, and then Benny Morris said, actually he means Hamas in addition to Jihad and the others.

      Steven Bonnell
      So of the invading Palestinian force, how many do you think killed civilians versus the IDF? What do you think the ballpark, the percentage?

      Mouin Rabbani
      Well, the figures we have are that about a third of the casualties on October 7th were military, and about two-thirds were-

      Steven Bonnell
      That’s not what I asked at all.

      Mouin Rabbani
      What’s your question?

      Benny Morris
      He’s asking about the two-thirds.

      Steven Bonnell
      What percentage of civilians do you think were killed by the invading force, a ballpark?

      Mouin Rabbani
      I think a clear majority, but I can’t give you a specific figure.

      Steven Weaselly
      If you thought it was closer to 51% or 99% were killed by-

      Norman Finkelstein
      Why would he know that? How would he know that?

      Steven Bonnell
      Because it’s interesting to actually stake out a position.

      Norman Finkelstein
      Yeah, it’s interesting-

      Steven Bonnell
      If you want to be completely, totally agnostic on it, that’s fine.

      Norman Finkelstein
      Based on complete ignorance, because we don’t know. Professor Morris doesn’t know, Mouin Rabbani doesn’t know.

      Steven Bonnell
      And yet you can speak with absolute certainty that the IDF is targeting and murdering Palestinian children intentionally.

      Norman Finkelstein
      Well, actually-

      Steven Bonnell
      Do you see the double standard?

      Norman Finkelstein
      No, I don’t. You see-

      Steven Bonnell
      I know you don’t. It was a rhetorical question, obviously you don’t.

      Norman Finkelstein
      You know why?

      Steven Bonnell
      Because you’re uneducated on the matter.

      Norman Finkelstein
      I looked at the UN report.

      Steven Bonnell
      Uh-huh. The Goldstone Report?

      Norman Finkelstein
      No. The UN report on the great march of return in 2018, and they said that the snipers were targeting children, medics, journalists, and disabled people.

      Mouin Rabbani
      Just as they are now in this conflict.

      Norman Finkelstein
      Exactly.

      • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
        20·
        8 months ago
        transcript cont. 3

        (cont.)
        Mouin Rabbani
        More journalists have been killed in the last several months in Gaza, than in any other conflict.

        Norman Finkelstein
        And in all of World War II.

        Steven Bonnell
        Do you acknowledge that Hamas… That’s great, the comparison is fun.

        Mouin Rabbani
        Hamas is not killing journalists in the Gaza strip.

        Steven Bonnell
        Do you agree that they operate in civilian uniforms, that their goal is to induce that confusion, that that’s the way that they conduct themselves militarily?

        Mouin Rabbani
        Let me finish my point. More journalists have been, more UN-

        Steven Bonnell
        I understand, and more children, and the-

        Norman Finkelstein
        He doesn’t want to hear it, it’s so boring.

        Steven Bonnell
        No, because it’s virtue signaling.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Virtue signaling!

        Steven Bonnell
        You don’t have a material, a substantial… It is virtue signaling. Yes, like when you say children, over and over again, that’s virtue signaling.

        Mouin Rabbani
        You know you have this habit of mocking the dead.

        Norman Finkelstein
        But talking about how many Israelis were killed, that’s not virtue signaling, because that’s human life.

        Steven Bonnell
        I don’t care if a hundred are killed or a thousand, I’m curious who you’re assigning blame to.

        Norman Finkelstein
        You just interrogated him, 51%, 90%.

        Steven Bonnell
        The question, yes, that’s not the number, that’s the responsibility, Norman.

        Norman Finkelstein
        And then Mouin mentions that more journalists were killed in Gaza than in all of World War II.

        Steven Bonnell
        That doesn’t further any part of the conversation.

        Norman Finkelstein
        And more medics were killed in Gaza.

        Benny Morris
        No, that’s silly.

        Norman Finkelstein
        And then he says, it’s virtue signaling.

        Benny Morris
        Journalists weren’t in the area.

        Norman Finkelstein
        But when Israelis get killed, that’s serious.

        Steven Bonnell
        I never said that. It’s serious on both sides. I didn’t say, respectfully-

        Mouin Rabbani
        It’s called [inaudible 04:51:29].

        Norman Finkelstein
        No, you called it virtue signaling.

        Steven Morelli
        No, I’m not virtue signaling, I’m asking a substantive question of who do you assign blame to, or do you play into Norm Finkelstein’s conspiracies that the ambulances should have known immediately who was dead, that the numbers were changed because they were fake.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Mr. Borrell, Mr. Borrell-

        Steven Bonnell
        Or that maybe 51% of the people were killed by Hamas and Islamic Jihad, but 29% were killed by IDF helicopters.

        Mouin Rabbani
        You asked me a direct question, and you got a direct answer.

        Steven Bonnell
        I didn’t, I got majority, which could be anything from 51 to 99.

        Mouin Rabbani
        I said a clear majority.

        Benny Morris
        What percent is a clear majority as opposed to a majority?

        Steven Berelli
        They live in ambiguity.

        Mouin Rabbani
        A clear majority, in my view, is well over 50%. Please don’t ask me to be more precise, because I can’t.

        Benny Morris
        You could say 80, 90, 95%.

        Mouin Rabbani
        If I knew that, I would say it.

        Benny Morris
        I think it’s reasonable. It’s a reasonable supposition.

        Mouin Rabbani
        Perhaps it is, but I…

        Norman Finkelstein
        Mr. Morris, you are not the best person to be asking that question. I read when you described Operation Defensive Shield, and you said a few dozen homes were destroyed.

        Benny Morris
        You’re talking about what happened in a Judean refugee camp.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Yeah. And you said-

        Benny Morris
        No, the Arabs said 500.

        Norman Finkelstein
        You said a few died-

        Benny Morris
        You guys said 500 Palestinians were killed in a Judean-

        Mouin Rabbani
        I never said that.

        Benny Morris
        No, but that was the statement from the PLO, the Palestinian Authority.

        Norman Finkelstein
        You said a few dozen homes-

        Benny Morris
        And that there were massacres there. Yes, a few dozen homes.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Yeah.

        Benny Morris
        That’s right.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Well, it turned 140 buildings were destroyed-

        Benny Morris
        That’s a few dozen.

        Norman Finkelstein
        … 5,000 people were left homeless.

        Benny Morris
        How many people were killed?

        Norman Finkelstein
        5,000.

        Benny Morris
        How many were killed?

        Norman Finkelstein
        You described it… No, I’m talking about homes destroyed. So you are not the best person to be criticizing what Mouin says when he says clear majority, but he can’t say more. You know why he can’t say more?

        Benny Morris
        He doesn’t know.

        Norman Finkelstein
        He doesn’t know.

        Benny Morris
        Yeah, I understand that. I understood that point.

        Norman Finkelstein
        I hope as a historian you understand that.

        Mouin Rabbani
        If I was trying to belittle, I would give you a very different answer. I would just say I don’t know. I do know that some were shot, but-

        Benny Morris
        You know what the right phrase there would be? The overwhelming majority were killed by Arab gunmen, and a very small number were killed by Israelis by accident or whatever.

        Norman Finkelstein
        You’re not speaking as a historian now.

        Benny Morris
        That’s probably true.

        Mouin Rabbani
        I can state with confidence, a clear majority. Overwhelming majority? You may be correct, but I can’t state that with certainty. I think there’s a very easy way to find out is to have an independent-

        Benny Morris
        Forget independent.

        Mouin Rabbani
        Well, of course you forget independent.

        Norman Finkelstein
        I know you want to forget the law-

        Benny Morris
        Well forget, that doesn’t mean anything.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Forget the law-

        Benny Morris
        Independent is the UN High Commission for-

        Norman Finkelstein
        – forget the independent commissioner. No!

        Benny Morris
        … Human Rights, whatever it’s called.

        Mouin Rabbani
        Not necessarily.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Just repeat the numbers.

        Benny Morris
        They’re all from barbaric countries. You know, a Syrian was the head of the UN Commission for Human Rights.

        Mouin Rabbani
        But if it was an Israeli, it would have been okay?

        Benny Morris
        He certainly would have been more honest than a Syrian.

        Norman Finkelstein
        Oh yeah, sure, of course.

        Mouin Rabbani
        Of course. Oh yeah, from your perspective.