• serinus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “unfortunately” is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he’s determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason.

      I understand people think it’s not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick.