• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nope. Pointing out your mistaken assumptions ≠ not understanding your subsequent explanations.

      Or, to explain it like you’re five: not agreeing with your take does not mean not understanding.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Pointing out your mistaken assumptions ≠ not understanding your subsequent explanations.

        Just out of curiosity, what are these mistaken assumptions of mine?

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The fact that I don’t phrase things exactly like you would have wanted me to is something you’ll just have to accept.

        Your arrogant, uncharitable and sanctimonious attitude is also not really doing you any favors.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You expressed yourself in an unclear manner and expected me and everyone to jump to a conclusion that doesn’t logically follow from what you said.

          Then you started attacking my intelligence and accusing me of arguing in bad faith due to my completely reasonable original interpretation of your vague statement.

          I’m not the one being arrogant, uncharitable and sanctimonious here, you are. Please just give it a rest already.

          • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s no logic here. It’s a reference. You didn’t get it. That’s ok.

            But it’s not my fault you didn’t get it. You just didn’t. Can you accept that you missed a reference? Can you accept that you were working off incomplete implication and reached the wrong conclusion?

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Your reference didn’t say what you thought it said. It happens. Now leave me the fuck alone.

              • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The reference is primo. You didn’t know it. That’s ok.

                Also wait, I should leave you the fuck alone? You have been picking a fight with me all morning!

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I haven’t, no. I’ve been calmly and patiently trying to correct the misconceptions you stubbornly cling to.

                  My patience is at an end, though, so kindly fuck off already.