The legal situation is more complex and nuanced than the headline implies, so the article is worth reading. This adds another ruling to the confusing case history regarding forced biometric unlocking.

  • fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The idea is usually to access the victim’s banking app, or 2fa app, etc, AFAIK.

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Both of those require their own password or biometrics, so you couldn’t access those either.

      • fl42v@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Idk about iOS, but android lets you add a fingerprint using the lock screen password

        • flames5123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          When changing biometric data on the iPhone, it locks you out of using it in other apps, making you put in your bank/other specific password.