It’s unnecesary and thus immoral. Just as killing humans for food is immoral. Your taste buds and habits are blinding you from choosing to be kind. Do the right thing
the controversy is in the structure, completeness, and origin. the constituent parts aren’t controversial, except to the extent that they may not be complete. self actualization may require a mastery of french cuisine, and that will require dairy, eggs, fish, poultry, and meat.
hurting animals is amoral. it’s the reason someone might hurt animals that determines the morality. killing animals for food is good.
It’s unnecesary and thus immoral. Just as killing humans for food is immoral. Your taste buds and habits are blinding you from choosing to be kind. Do the right thing
you literally don’t know what I need.
What do you need?
I need a lot. maslow has a pretty widely accepted theory on it.
You can get everything from maslows pyramid being vegan. Side note though the pyramid has been controversial for a long time
you don’t know that. it’s patronizing to presume you know others’ needs.
WFPB is the cheapest diet in the world, no one needs animal products to survive.
for some people, that might be true. for others, no. regardless, survival is not all that people need.
the controversy is in the structure, completeness, and origin. the constituent parts aren’t controversial, except to the extent that they may not be complete. self actualization may require a mastery of french cuisine, and that will require dairy, eggs, fish, poultry, and meat.
Killing isn’t a requirement for any culture, there are many french vegans and they’ve adapted their coisine. It’s further adapting everyday
there may be french vegans, but they can’t prepare foie gras or croissants or brie or camembert.